I don't have the table in front of me now, but you've probably seen it. When we first look at it, there's a list of benefits that can be received, down one axis of this table. Then there's a list of different categories of people who can receive different kinds of benefits, if you can link it to war service, different categories for different—the merchant marine, for example. But there are several categories across. The total grid is something like an eight-by-twelve table, so there are that many different cells of eligibility on this table.
The biggest problem we have with it is that for many of the benefits you have to be able to link it to something that happened to you in war service. That's the problem. We think it doesn't make sense. For example, there's epidemiological evidence that we cited in the report that musculoskeletal diseases are more prevalent in people who had war service. So you could assume that had something to do with what happened to them during the Second World War.
A lot of musculoskeletal problems arise only in later life, so to ask someone now to try to relate that condition to something that happened to them when they were in overseas service in Italy or Normandy or whatever just doesn't seem reasonable, but it also doesn't seem necessary. If the person had the military service and has the need, we think it should be met.