Yes. First of all, and this was raised today, this is trying to broaden the consideration of whether the spouse or others are involved as part of the consideration. That's the main gist. It was mentioned today by the witnesses that that should be included. I'm looking for a little guidance on subclause 3(1).
Again, the intent overall is recognizing--as we heard both today and also from the Legion--the separation in what the terms were. It's not in there, but as we go through this we recognize the difference between honour and a medal, etc., so this is dealing more with the spouses. But I just want to keep that as a background. Obviously, the medals were the most contentious part of it.