If I might, Mr. Stoffer, I'll thank you for the question. I do appreciate your correction on the issue. Once I said “generous”, I knew that it was poorly chosen, and I was thinking “flexible”. I appreciate the correction.
On the issue of bruxism, I'm certainly not aware of the particular case to which you refer, but I am aware that the issue around bruxism and the related issues around dental damage and so on have been an issue over the last while. I can tell you that I am aware of it and that we are looking at it to see what we can do.
As you know, with our treatment programs through our veterans health care regulations, for disabilities for which entitlement is awarded—meaning a pension service-related condition—then treatment associated with it falls under our treatment regulations. Sometimes the challenge becomes showing a direct link between the outcome and the condition.
I appreciate your raising it. We are sensitive to it and, from a policy point of view at least, we are looking at it.