That has to do, maybe, with the culture and collegiality of the board itself. I met somebody on the road in one of my outreaches, a previous member of the board who said that what she missed was that people were never together, and there was no chance to develop an organizational culture. Because boards sit independently in different areas of the country, there is never an opportunity to share expertise, past experiences, and decisions. Obviously, it's a matter of culture.
The board structure and how the board uses its members are things that are very important, but we need to look at the process first. I think if the process is clearly defined and works well, from adjudication to review and appeal, then we can see the best way the board can work, which can be looked at later in the process.