Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Mr. Casey raises a good point that we haven't had a formal discussion. But at the same time I sit across from Mr. Casey and listen to him intently. I've listened to Ms. Mathyssen's interventions. I think I can ascertain their position rather well, as have you, Mr. Chair.
In essence, to state the position of the NDP, it would be general agreement with the provisions. They would want to pull it outside of the budget implementation act, which I don't think is reasonable. But if it goes to the heart of the amendments themselves, it sounds like there's general consensus on that. Mr. Casey's questions have really been related to litigation and things prior to this act or what may have led to the act, but there seems to be consensus ad idem on the provisions themselves. That's essentially what the letter addresses, and it will get these benefits moving faster. So I think we call a vote.