I'll comment, and then maybe Don Sorochan can comment.
I think one of the issues in this particular action by Equitas is that people see it as a slight to the government for soldiers to ask the courts to define their rights and benefits. As we send our soldiers overseas, we always say it's because we want to install democracy in countries like Afghanistan.
Parts of democracy are the government and the courts. We have the courts, the Senate, the House, and they all form our democracy in Canada. There's nothing wrong with soldiers asking the courts what legal rights we have in this country. The courts will define them.
Right now, we're at odds. During the trial, the government lawyers said that soldiers are no different from anybody else collecting welfare and that the government has the right to set welfare as they see fit. We disagree with that opinion, and therefore we're asking an independent source to say there is a duty of care by the government in individual cases, not mass funding. The courts don't look at funding requirements, they look at individual cases. That's why I think it's the appropriate place right now for soldiers to be addressing their individual rights in contract with the government.
Don?