Now, Corporal Fuchko was in a couple of days ago and he had lump sums of $566,000 between VAC and SISIP and of course, there are other benefits, the earnings loss benefit, and permanent impairment allowance.
If we had called it the earnings loss pension instead of the earnings loss benefit, and called the permanent impairment allowance the permanent impairment pension, would that make it more acceptable? The money's there and it's a matter of accessing it and we don't make it easy enough to access that, but some of it is just perception. Is that a fair statement?