That was the CF ombudsman? Just to make sure, because our ombudsman has also put some stuff out, and I wanted to make sure I answer the right thing.
I agree with some of the statements from the CF ombudsman. It is really for the CAF to debate or not debate the findings. When I look at Mr. Walbourne's comments, I agree with the concierge service, and that's what we're trying to do with the guided support. Let's make sure we do that transition, not just for mental health but for all transitioning veterans.
His comments about the service attribution being done by the Canadian Armed Forces, that I don't agree with, because what happens to the people who have left? If we know that 60% of the people who are not medically releasing are having issues and they come to us two to 40 years down the road, who will be adjudicating those cases? Who takes care of that population that is already gone? It won't be the CAF doctor.
I have some concerns about Mr. Walbourne's comment on that area. We have met with him, not me personally, but my RDG has met with him and Mr. Butler, who was here, also sat down with him to go through the findings. I agree with a lot of the other ones. Simplify the process. Have it online so somebody can apply online. Let's facilitate the usage of the medical health records, so that we only use what we need to useāand we've done a lot of work on that already, by the way. I talked about the concierge service. Those parts I absolutely agree with. How do we get there?