Debates of May 6th, 1994
House of Commons Hansard #65 of the 35th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was political.
Topics
- Pearson International Airport Agreements Act
- Bosnian Children Relief
- Eaton Yale Limitée
- Mother's Day
- Israel
- Victims Of War
- Quebec's Major Central Labour Bodies
- Arnold Smith
- Mental Health Week
- Canadian Federation Of Labour
- 2002 Winter Olympic Games
- Quebec City-Windsor High-Speed Train
- Children In Bosnia
- Young Offenders Act
- South African Elections
- Unemployment
- Jocelyne Fleurant
- Unemployment
- Defence Industries
- The Deficit
- Mil Davie Shipyard
- Bill C-18
- Indian Affairs
- Employment
- Transportation In Remote Areas
- Publications
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Sexual Orientation
- Health Care
- Pulp And Paper Industry
- National Defence
- National Revenue
- Agriculture
- Presence In The Gallery
- Government Response To Petitions
- National Adoption Awareness Month Act
- Income Tax Act
- Business Of The House
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Pearson International Airports Agreement Act
- Party Fundraising
National Revenue
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Victoria
B.C.
Liberal
David Anderson Minister of National Revenue
Mr. Speaker, as I understand the law that would be beyond my powers.
National Revenue
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Reform
Bob Mills Red Deer, AB
Mr. Speaker, that is a very hard answer or non-answer to take.
While jobs have been lost, while investment has been lost and now because the department is going back to 1991, people are actually going to lose their homes. It is very difficult to understand why the minister cannot explain his policy. I would ask him to examine this again and come back to the House with an answer.
National Revenue
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Victoria
B.C.
Liberal
David Anderson Minister of National Revenue
Mr. Speaker, I will certainly accept the suggestion of the hon. member to re-examine the case. As I explained in my response to the first question, I understand this is in fact something that is beyond my powers because the law is written in a certain way.
As members of the House know, the Minister of National Revenue is very circumscribed in what he can do by laws made by Parliament.
I do feel, however, that it does show a substantive difference between the attitude of the two parties, ours and theirs. On this side we definitely believe that laws should be followed by ministers as well as by other people.
National Revenue
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Reform
National Revenue
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Liberal
David Anderson Victoria, BC
On the other side I have been urged to ignore the law. I find that to be a significant difference between our two parties.
Agriculture
Oral Question Period
11:55 a.m.
Liberal
Don Boudria Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
Mr. Speaker, my question is for the Minister of Agriculture. The minister recently came back from an economic mission in Asia.
Can he tell us what the positive economic benefits will be for the Canadian farming industry following his visit to China, in particular?
Agriculture
Oral Question Period
Noon
Regina—Wascana
Saskatchewan
Liberal
Ralph Goodale Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
Mr. Speaker, the diplomatic and trade mission that has just been concluded to Japan, Korea, China and Hong Kong involving the Governor General, myself and a number of Canadian agri-food business leaders was a significant success for Canada.
We were able to conclude certain transactions during the course of our travels. More important than that, we have laid significant foundations and opened some new doors for future business and trade for Canada in the Asia-Pacific region which is the fastest growing economic zone on the face of the earth.
The opportunities include obviously the grain trade, wheat, barley and malt, canola, alfalfa, livestock, animal genetics, animal husbandry, livestock feeds, agriculture technology, education and training, potash, fertilizer, value added in the food-
Presence In The Gallery
Oral Question Period
Noon
The Speaker
I wish to draw the attention of members to the presence in our gallery of the Hon. Pierre Paradis, Minister of Environment and Wildlife of Quebec.
Presence In The Gallery
Oral Question Period
Noon
Some hon. members
Hear, hear.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Kingston and the Islands
Ontario
Liberal
Peter Milliken Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 36(8), I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to certain petitions.
National Adoption Awareness Month Act
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Liberal
Don Boudria Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-246, an act respecting National Adoption Awareness Month.
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to have the opportunity to present to this House a bill to recognize November as National Adoption Awareness Month.
November has traditionally been recognized as National Adoption Awareness Month even though this has not been the case in legislation. Furthermore the province of British Columbia by proclamation of the premier does recognize November as being Adoption Awareness Month.
I am pleased to present this bill today. I am pleased to indicate that this bill is presented with the support of the Adoption Council of Canada.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed.)
Income Tax Act
Routine Proceedings
Noon
Reform
Jim Silye Calgary Centre, AB
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-247, an act to amend the Income Tax Act (child care expenses).
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise today to try and correct an injustice we found through the Income Tax Act in its efforts to drive and dictate social policies.
The Income Tax Act currently discriminates against stay at home parents because the child care expense deduction is only available to families who pay institutions to look after their children. Because stay at home parents are not a "discreet and insular minority" the courts have ruled they do not qualify for a child care expense deduction.
The purpose of this bill is to amend the Income Tax Act to allow parents to choose the method of child care and allow the deduction of a fixed amount as child care expenses of $5,000 up to age 7 or $3,000 between ages 8 and 14, regardless of the income of the parents and of the amount of child care expenses actually incurred.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed.)
Business Of The House
Routine Proceedings
12:05 p.m.
Kingston and the Islands
Ontario
Liberal
Peter Milliken Parliamentary Secretary to Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, I think you will find unanimous consent for the following motion. I move:
That, on Tuesday, May 10, 1994, the House shall continue to sit after 6.30 p.m. for the purpose of considering government business Motion No. 12 in the name of the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food, provided that the Chair shall not receive any dilatory motions or quorum calls and that, when no additional member wishes to speak, but in any case no later than 10 o'clock p.m., the Speaker shall adjourn the House to the next sitting day.
(Motion agreed to.)
Business Of The House
Routine Proceedings
12:05 p.m.
Liberal
Peter Milliken Kingston and the Islands, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you also will find unanimous consent for the following motion. I move:
That, notwithstanding any standing order, the sitting of the House on June 6, 1994 shall commence at two o'clock p.m.
(Motion agreed to.)
Petitions
Routine Proceedings
May 6th, 1994 / 12:05 p.m.
Reform
Lee Morrison Swift Current—Maple Creek—Assiniboia, SK
Mr. Speaker, I have yet another petition from constituents of mine requesting that section 745 of the Criminal Code of Canada be repealed. I would like to table this pursuant to Standing Order 36. I do concur completely with the petition.
