Debates of May 28th, 1999
House of Commons Hansard #233 of the 36th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was victims.
Topics
- Points Of Order
- Criminal Code
- Jack Wells
- Nanoose Bay
- Lord Strathcona Horse
- Medical Research Council
- The Family
- School Bus Safety
- Astronaut Julie Payette
- Windsor And Essex County
- Port Authority Boards
- Riding Of Brome—Missisquoi
- The Balkans
- The Environment
- Premier Of Ontario
- Industry Canada
- Gasoline Pricing
- Public Works Canada
- Centre De Recherche En Infectiologie
- The Economy
- Foreign Affairs
- Publishing Industry
- Immigration
- Justice
- National Defence
- Tainted Blood
- Publishing Industry
- Tainted Blood
- Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
- Radio-Canada
- Publishing Industry
- Customs Act
- Publishing Industry
- Agriculture
- Finance
- Justice
- Water Contamination
- Canadian Grain Commission
- Devco
- Agriculture
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Universities
- Pensions
- Fisheries
- National Revenue
- Canadian Security Intelligence Service
- Canadian Broadcasting Corporation
- Points Of Order
- Land Claim Agreements
- Government Response To Petitions
- Canadian Brides
- Committees Of The House
- Petitions
- Questions On The Order Paper
- Criminal Code
- Canada Travelling Exhibitions Indemnification Act
- Criminal Code
Publishing Industry
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Hamilton East
Ontario
Liberal
Sheila Copps Minister of Canadian Heritage
Mr. Speaker, first I would like to underscore a comment that was written not in a Canadian newspaper but in the Washington Post yesterday when it said in a line story:
—for the first time the United States was forced to accept the principle that, even in a free trade environment, foreign countries could take steps to limit access to their markets by American firms in an effort to protect the viability of local culture, in this case the Canadian magazine industry—
That precedent could eventually come into play as the United States continues its campaign to tear down barriers—
This is a first not only for Canada but it is a first in international agreements. The U.S. should respect the agreement that it signed on subsidies and countervailing duties which specifically denies national treatment in the area of subsidies. It is as simple as that.
Agriculture
Oral Question Period
May 28th, 1999 / 11:45 a.m.
Progressive Conservative
Rick Borotsik Brandon—Souris, MB
Mr. Speaker, the minister of agriculture has acknowledged that there is a disaster taking place in southwestern Manitoba. We have much too much water, two million acres are in jeopardy of not being planted and the possibility of a $400 million loss in the economy in the area.
In 1998 the government rightfully put forward a compensation package for farmers during the ice storm in Ontario and Quebec. Can the minister tell me please what kind of compensation package will be put forward for disaster assistance in Manitoba and Saskatchewan?
Agriculture
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Prince Edward—Hastings
Ontario
Liberal
Lyle Vanclief Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
Mr. Speaker, we assisted producers in Manitoba at that time as well. They were assisted through the disaster funding assistance agreement with the provinces which, if requested by the provinces, deals with the loss of assets.
In this case I am certainly not happy with the fact that there is that much land which is being flooded. Hopefully the weather will clear in order to allow the farmers to seed as much of that as possible.
I will be having discussions as early as today with the minister in Manitoba to discuss how we can assist through existing programs to help those farmers.
Agriculture
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Progressive Conservative
Rick Borotsik Brandon—Souris, MB
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the minister's comments about assistance. An emergency request was made by the province of Manitoba just yesterday to the PMRA to have aerial spraying take place as opposed to land spraying because obviously they cannot get on the land.
My question is for the Minister of Health. What is his department prepared to do to help these farmers who in fact may get some of those acres planted but they need an emergency registration?
Agriculture
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Etobicoke Centre
Ontario
Liberal
Allan Rock Minister of Health
Mr. Speaker, the member was kind enough to raise this issue with me yesterday directly. After our conversation I learned that the application will be considered on its merits.
As the member knows the PMRA has to balance public safety and environmental concerns against the needs of producers and growers. We will do the very best we can and the agency will respond as soon as possible.
Finance
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Liberal
Mac Harb Ottawa Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, as you may know, there is no international standard for public accounting. When the Government of Canada issues its financial statement, tangible assets such as properties are not included in the balance sheet.
Can the Minister of Finance tell the House if he is concerned about the lack of standards? Would he support the efforts of the public accounts committee in this area?
Finance
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
LaSalle—Émard
Québec
Liberal
Paul Martin Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, given the hon. member's great experience in this area, he is fully aware that transparency in financial statements by governments and indeed by private sector corporations is essential if we are going to have a sound international system.
As a result of this, consistent accounting standards have to be consistently applied. Therefore we certainly support the role of the public accounts committee in this area and certainly support the efforts of the hon. member in this area.
I am delighted to see that the International Accounting Standards Committee is going to report on this very soon, but this is something in which Canada will certainly take a lead.
Justice
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Reform
Chuck Cadman Surrey North, BC
Mr. Speaker, once again Canadians are outraged by the ease with which our laws allow people to escape accountability for their actions.
Bert Stone killed his wife because she insulted him. Yesterday the supreme court upheld his lenient sentence and in effect accepted his provocation defence. A discussion paper on this issue was distributed a year ago. The Stone case was not the first and others have occurred since.
The provocation defence is archaic. Canadians want it eliminated entirely or at the very least severely restricted in its use and they want some action now. Will the Minister of Justice act immediately to put a stop to these travesties?
Justice
Oral Question Period
11:45 a.m.
Edmonton West
Alberta
Liberal
Anne McLellan Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Mr. Speaker, I want to clarify for the hon. member that the Supreme Court of Canada in Stone as I understand it did not deal with the defence of provocation. However the hon. member is right that we are consulting on the defence of provocation as well as the defence of self-defence. I hope to be able to release the results of those consultations and proposals for changes to the law in the coming months.
Water Contamination
Oral Question Period
11:50 a.m.
Bloc
Ghislain Fournier Manicouagan, QC
Mr. Speaker, this is the third time that I rise in this House to talk about the terrible problem of water contamination by the Department of Transport around the beaches of Sept-Îles.
The Secretary of State for Economic Development for the Regions of Quebec came and promised residents of Sept-Îles that the Minister of Transport would meet them.
My question is for the Minister of Transport. Considering that mothers must wash their babies with bottled water, does the government not realize that mere talking is no longer enough and that immediate action is required to repair the damage it has caused?
Water Contamination
Oral Question Period
11:50 a.m.
Hull—Aylmer
Québec
Liberal
Marcel Massé President of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for Infrastructure
Mr. Speaker, water contamination in Sept-Îles is a very important issue into which our government is looking.
I will relay the hon. member's question to the secretary of state responsible for economic development and to the Minister of Transport, to see if they can provide him with a more detailed reply.
Canadian Grain Commission
Oral Question Period
11:50 a.m.
NDP
Dick Proctor Palliser, SK
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food knows that the Canadian Grain Commission has existed for decades to serve prairie grain farmers. Now however the commission is running a $10 million deficit and many farmers are concerned that on-site grain inspection will be a victim of this financial shortfall. Farmers fear cost cutting would do real harm to Canada's excellent reputation as an exporter of top-notch grains.
Given all that, could the minister assure all Canadians that our reputation as a world class supplier of grain will never be compromised?
Canadian Grain Commission
Oral Question Period
11:50 a.m.
Prince Edward—Hastings
Ontario
Liberal
Lyle Vanclief Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food
Mr. Speaker, I will definitely assure Canadian farmers as well as those in the international community who buy our excellent product that our reputation will be maintained.
The Canadian Grain Commission is having some stress financially, I agree. It has carried out a thorough set of consultations. My officials and I are meeting with the commission. Any changes and improvements that are made will in no way, shape or form jeopardize the quality of its work.
Devco
Oral Question Period
11:50 a.m.
Progressive Conservative
Gerald Keddy South Shore, NS
Mr. Speaker, the Northside Futures Group states that since 1968 a 25 cent per tonne royalty has been set aside on every tonne of coal mined by Devco. These moneys were set aside to benefit workers upon eventual closure of the mine.
My question is for the Minister of Natural Resources. What has happened to these millions of dollars? Were these millions of dollars included in the package offered to the Devco miners?
Devco
Oral Question Period
11:50 a.m.
Wascana
Saskatchewan
Liberal
Ralph Goodale Minister of Natural Resources and Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board
Mr. Speaker, with respect to the specific point the hon. gentleman refers to, I will have to double check that proposition to determine exactly the truth of that matter.
I can assure him that all factors were very carefully taken into account by the government in arranging the final package with respect to the Devco situation. It includes very generous provisions with respect to human resources issues as well as a further package for regional economic development to find alternatives in the area.
