Debates of Feb. 24th, 2000
House of Commons Hansard #56 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was research.
Topics
- Points Of Order
- Government Response To Petitions
- Division No. 747
- An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
- Division No. 748
- Canadian Institutes Of Health Research Act
- Division No. 749
- National Defence
- Agriculture
- Estonia
- Black History Month
- Coca-Cola Bottling Company
- The Senate
- Economic Development
- Depleted Uranium
- Black History Month
- The Economy
- Black History Month
- Flangers Rock Group
- Human Resources Development
- Chechnya
- Refugee Identification
- Federal Government
- Gasoline Prices
- Agriculture
- Human Resources Development
- Health Care
- Cida
- Human Resources Development
- Health Care
- Cinar
- Agriculture
- Human Resources Development
- Gasoline Prices
- Industrial Cooperation Program
- Commemorative Stamp
- Human Resources Development
- Importation Of Plutonium
- Scotia Rainbow
- Cida
- Iran
- Hockey
- Human Resources Development
- Business Of The House
- Canada Post Corporation Act
- Division No. 750
- Points Of Order
- Canadian Institutes Of Health Research Act
- Division No. 751
- Business Of The House
- Senate
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
Some hon. members
No.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault)
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
Some hon. members
Yea.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault)
All those opposed will please say nay.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
Some hon. members
Nay.
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault)
In my opinion the nays. have it.
And more than five members having risen:
Government Response To Petitions
Routine Proceedings
10:45 a.m.
The Acting Speaker (Ms. Thibeault)
Call in the members.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
Division No. 747
Routine Proceedings
11:25 a.m.
The Speaker
I declare the motion carried.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
February 24th, 2000 / 11:25 a.m.
Glengarry—Prescott—Russell
Ontario
Liberal
Don Boudria Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
moved:
That in relation to Bill C-20, an act to give effect to the requirement for clarity as set out in the opinion of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Quebec Secession Reference, not more than ten further hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the committee stage of the bill and, at the expiry of the time provided for in this order, any proceedings before the legislative committee on the said bill shall be interrupted, if required for the purpose of this order, and in turn every question necessary for the disposal of the said stage of the said bill shall be put forthwith and successively without further debate or amendment.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
11:25 a.m.
Some hon. members
Shame, shame.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
11:30 a.m.
The Speaker
The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
11:30 a.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
11:30 a.m.
Some hon. members
No.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
11:30 a.m.
The Speaker
All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.
An Act To Give Effect To The Requirement For Clarity As Set Out In The Opinion Of The Supreme Court Of Canada In The Quebec Secession Reference
Government Orders
11:30 a.m.
Some hon. members
Yea.