House of Commons Hansard #124 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was marine.

Topics

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

Liberal

Derek Lee Scarborough—Rouge River, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I hate to be picky at a time like this, but it would be possible for us simply not to conclude the debate on it. The hon. member's item would stay on the order of precedence and come up again for the final portion of debate at a future date in the normal order, or otherwise if the parties came to an agreement on it. That would be a reasonable disposition.

The only other disposition is to allow the debate to conclude and go to a vote, as had been previously ordered by the House. Perhaps the hon. member could give us his view. I am sure the rest of the House would accept the member's view on it.

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

NDP

Nelson Riis Kamloops, BC

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate my colleague's comments. I know that there are others who wish to speak to this motion. Rather than deny them the opportunity to speak, I would certainly accept the suggestion that we adjourn the debate at this point and pick it up at an appropriate time some time in the future. I know that is probably not the correct parliamentary term.

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

September 28th, 2000 / 5:50 p.m.

Bloc

René Laurin Joliette, QC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I would like to know exactly where we stand, because this motion is already deemed to have been put and the vote deferred until next Tuesday.

If it is already deemed to have been put, how can we now drop it and resume debate? It would be necessary to go back on an earlier decision. I seek clarification, so that we do not get caught.

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

The motion being deemed put would only come into effect at the conclusion of debate. Since it has been suggested by the hon. member for Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys that we adjourn the debate, the deemed motion would not come into effect and we would be okay in that regard.

Is there unanimous consent for the hon. member for Kamloops, Thompson and Highland Valleys to move a motion that the debate be adjourned?

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

NDP

Nelson Riis Kamloops, BC

moved:

That the debate be now adjourned.

(Motion agreed to)

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

It has been brought to my attention that we have a late show. Is there a motion to adjourn the House?

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

Reform

Deborah Grey Edmonton North, AB

moved:

That the House do now adjourn.

(Motion agreed to)

Cultural Industry
Private Members' Business

5:50 p.m.

The Acting Speaker (Mr. McClelland)

It being 5.53 p.m., the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 5.53 p.m.)