The Chair is quite prepared to deal with the point of order raised by the hon. member. I note that he filed a question which had eight parts. It was found that five of the parts were acceptable and three were not.
On review of the situation, I think that I am prepared to allow parts 6 and 7, that is (f) and (g), to be included, but I agree with the exclusion of (h) since it appears to be argumentative. It contains inferences. It is “ironical, rhetorical, offensive, or contain[s] epithet, innuendo, satire” or whatever, as stated in Beauchesne's in the citations to which the hon. member has referred so ably in his argument.
Accordingly I am allowing (f) and (g), but continue to disallow (h), and the Order Paper will be amended accordingly.