Debates of June 10th, 2008
House of Commons Hansard #109 of the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was tobacco.
Topics
- Question Period
- Nisga'a Final Agreement
- Westbank First Nations Self-government Agreement
- Government Response to Petitions
- Committees of the House
- Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security Act
- Canada Labour Code
- Committees of the House
- Business of the House
- Points of Order
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Food and Drugs Act
- Canadian Forces
- Portuguese Canadians
- Income Tax Act
- Phone Companies
- Myra Canyon
- Immigration
- The Environment
- Michelle Bachelet
- The Environment
- M. Evenchick Jewellery Inc.
- Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
- Food and Drugs Act
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Laval Transit Authority
- Aboriginal Affairs
- The Environment
- Patricia Ann Boname
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Gasoline Prices
- Regional Economic Development
- Gasoline Prices
- Regional Economic Development
- Public Safety
- Justice
- Omar Khadr
- Foreign Affairs
- The Environment
- National Defence
- Ethics
- Justice
- Trade
- Citizenship and Immigration
- The Environment
- Income Tax Act
- Fisheries and Oceans
- Search and Rescue
- Agriculture and Agri-Food
- Equalization Payments
- Canada Elections Act
- Committees of the House
- Afghanistan
- Private Members' Business
- Food and Drugs Act
- Income Tax Act
Justice
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Raymond Simard Saint Boniface, MB
Mr. Speaker, surely the Minister of Justice recognizes the conflict of interest here.
The President of the Treasury Board named the judicial appointments committee that would be responsible for vetting his candidacy. He is the regional minister for Manitoba and would be making the recommendation to cabinet on his own appointment, and he is a member of the cabinet who would make the ultimate decision on that appointment.
Can the Conservative government not see that this is clearly unacceptable?
Justice
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Fundy Royal
New Brunswick
Conservative
Rob Moore Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Mr. Speaker, our government has always been guided by the principles of merit and legal excellence in the selection and appointments of judges to Canada's superior and federal courts. Each and every one of our 165 judicial appointments have reflected those principles and the next 165 we make will be exactly the same.
Trade
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Bloc
Guy André Berthier—Maskinongé, QC
Mr. Speaker, the government announced that it has concluded a free trade agreement with Colombia. Yet that country has one of the worst records in terms of labour laws and human rights. No conditions in this regard appear in the agreement itself as a prerequisite to its signing and nothing seems to have been imposed on Colombia.
How can the Conservative government justify such an agreement knowing that Colombia does not honour its international obligations on these issues and that the Standing Committee on International Trade, which is currently holding hearings on the matter, has not tabled any reports?
Trade
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Jonquière—Alma
Québec
Conservative
Jean-Pierre Blackburn Minister of Labour and Minister of the Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec
Mr. Speaker, as you know, we recently signed a free trade agreement and a parallel agreement with respect to workers' rights with Peru. Over the weekend, we also concluded an agreement with the Government of Colombia.
I would remind the House that Canada has never entered into an agreement that does so much to protect workers' rights in those two countries. We have a new generation of agreements that are much stronger than before and that include penalties if the government fails to honour its signature on the agreements reached. I think this is a very positive step for workers' rights in both countries.
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Bloc
Michel Guimond Montmorency—Charlevoix—Haute-Côte-Nord, QC
Mr. Speaker, last Thursday, when I asked the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration a question, she asked me to provide specific instances where visas had been denied. Here is one. The International Eucharistic Congress of Quebec, which starts on June 15, sent out 1,300 invitations to people throughout the world. The delegates are clergy, members of religious orders and lay persons who were recommended by the bishop in their diocese.
Will the minister admit that her department acted zealously when we consider that more than 300 of the delegates will not be able to come to Quebec City because their visas were denied? The bishops—
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Haldimand—Norfolk
Ontario
Conservative
Diane Finley Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Mr. Speaker, as I said last week, we want to help people organize conferences and make them successful. However, anyone who wants to enter Canada must follow the legal application process. I offered my assistance to the hon. member if he could provide me with details of particular cases. I am still waiting.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
David McGuinty Ottawa South, ON
Mr. Speaker, it is not enough that every independent group concluded that the Conservatives cannot live up to their climate change promises. Now, Environment Canada agrees. Its report shows that the Minister of Finance, through his tax deductible transit pass gimmick, is charging taxpayers $36,000 a year to take a single car off the road.
Given that the Minister of Finance is legally responsible for pricing carbon, can he explain how $7,200 a tonne for carbon is good value for money? Or will he tell us again that it is simply a “scientific question”?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Peter Milliken
Order, order. The Minister of the Environment now has the floor and the member for Ottawa South at least wants to hear the answer.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Conservative
John Baird Ottawa West—Nepean, ON
Mr. Speaker, the one thing that has become increasingly clear in this House of Commons is that the Liberal Party of Canada, its leader, and its environment critic are completely against tax cuts for middle class families in this country.
That is something those of us on this side of the House support. We want to support commuters to make the shift from cars to public transit and this is just one way we are helping to get the job done.
Income Tax Act
Oral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Conservative
Denis Lebel Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, tomorrow the House will vote on private member's Bill C-207 introduced by the Bloc. The bill was rejected by the majority of members of the Standing Committee on Finance because the financial implications were too great, it would not obtain the desired results and it did not constitute a long-term solution.
Canadians want real solutions like our targeted initiatives for regional economic development—for example, the $1 billion national community development trust—and not Bloc proposals that are riddled with serious shortcomings.
Could the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance explain to the House the ramifications of passing such a bill?
Income Tax Act
Oral Questions
June 10th, 2008 / 3 p.m.
Macleod
Alberta
Conservative
Ted Menzies Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, as members know, the finance committee has studied Bill C-207 and the Liberal members, along with the Conservative majority, recognize the many flaws in the bill.
It would be unfortunate, but should it pass, it would cost the federal government $600 million in foregone revenues, with no evidence that this would help regional economic development. I would encourage all members of the House to act responsibly and oppose this private member's legislation.
Fisheries and Oceans
Oral Questions
3 p.m.
NDP
Catherine Bell Vancouver Island North, BC
Mr. Speaker, Pacific salmon are important to the history, economy and culture of British Columbia, especially for first nations communities. A once abundant chinook, sockeye and coho fishery has been nearly decimated. If any one salmon species is deemed endangered, the effect would be devastating for the entire west coast fishery.
Commercial fishing: gone. Sport and recreation fishing: gone. Report after report points the finger to lack of leadership from DFO on protecting fish habitat.
Why does a self-monitored industry go unchecked while habitat is irrevocably damaged?
