Debates of May 31st, 2010
House of Commons Hansard #52 of the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was energy.
Topics
- Question Period
- The Economy
- Jobs and Economic Growth Act
- Commission of Inquiry into the Mulroney-Schreiber Dealings
- Jobs and Economic Growth Act
- Justice
- World No Tobacco Day
- “MP for a Day” Competition
- Oil Spills
- Hockey
- Anniversary Congratulations
- Étienne-Le Bel Clinical Research Centre
- International Children's Day
- Agriculture
- St. John's International Airport
- Economic Growth
- Freedom Flotilla
- The Economy
- Canada Elections Act
- Public Safety
- Firearms Registry
- Public Safety
- Firearms Registry
- Public Safety
- Maternal and Child Health
- Offshore Drilling
- Firearms Registry
- Foreign Affairs
- Securities
- Minister of Industry
- Ethics
- Firearms Registry
- Offshore Drilling
- Fisheries
- Medical Isotopes
- Bill C-9
- The Environment
- Status of Women
- Agriculture
- Citizenship and Immigration
- Foreign Affairs
- Sydney Harbour
- Health
- Points of Order
- Agreement concerning Annual Reports on Human Rights and Free Trade between Canada and the Republic of Colombia
- Canadian Forces Pension Plan
- Government Response to Petitions
- Criminal Code
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Jobs and Economic Growth Act
- Business of Supply
Minister of Industry
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Wayne Easter Malpeque, PE
Mr. Speaker, this video is no trade mission. Even the National Post gets that message. It said that it was no trade mission. It said today:
If [he] doesn't understand the distinctions, maybe he's not qualified to be industry minister.
It added:
Picture Hillary Clinton... promoting Mars bars in Shanghai.
Government policy bars a minister from providing a marketing advantage to single entities. Will the Prime Minister act on this brazen violation of the rules?
Minister of Industry
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Parry Sound—Muskoka
Ontario
Conservative
Tony Clement Minister of Industry
Mr. Speaker, we on this side of the House are proud in our role and responsibility as MPs and as cabinet ministers to promote business, promote Canadian business, promote jobs and promote opportunities. That is part of our job.
What do those members do on the other side? They think of ways to tax Canadians and tax businesses, which is why they are on that side. That is why we have 6.1% growth in quarter one. We are proud of our record.
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Siobhan Coady St. John's South—Mount Pearl, NL
Mr. Speaker, today, Justice Oliphant found countless ethical violations involving Brian Mulroney.
Mr. Mulroney received a $2.1 million settlement from Canadians after he claimed, under oath, that he had no business relationship with Karlheinz Schreiber.
Justice Oliphant called Mr. Mulroney's excuses “patently absurd”.
In light of today's report, will the government immediately launch legal proceedings to recover the $2.1 million and launch a broader inquiry to finally get to the bottom of the Airbus affair?
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Niagara Falls
Ontario
Conservative
Rob Nicholson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Mr. Speaker, the government sends its appreciation to Justice Oliphant and all those who worked with him in producing that report.
The report was released about an hour and a half ago. It makes a number of recommendations and the government will be reviewing those recommendations.
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Marcel Proulx Hull—Aylmer, QC
Mr. Speaker, it was the Conservatives who prevented Justice Oliphant from investigating the real issue.
Brian Mulroney stated under oath that he did not have a business relationship with Karlheinz Schreiber. This got him a $2.1 million payment from the government. We must immediately initiate legal proceedings to recover the $2.1 million and there should be a public inquiry into the Airbus affair.
Will they take these two steps or will they continue to protect their own?
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Niagara Falls
Ontario
Conservative
Rob Nicholson Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
Again, Mr. Speaker, as usual, the hon. member has it wrong. The questions were drafted by an independent individual, a Dr. Johnston.
There have been a number of recommendations and the government will be reviewing those recommendations in due course.
Firearms Registry
Oral Questions
May 31st, 2010 / 2:40 p.m.
Conservative
Dave Van Kesteren Chatham-Kent—Essex, ON
Mr. Speaker, this week, the public safety committee will start clause-by-clause consideration of Bill C-391 to scrap the wasteful long gun registry.
Front line police officers from across the country, as well as four key provincial attorneys general and justice ministers have all been clear. They oppose keeping the wasteful and inefficient long gun registry, and yet Liberal and NDP members continue to ignore these voices.
Would the Parliamentary Secretary for the Minister of Public Safety tell the House why the Liberals and the NDP should avoid political games and support this bill?
Firearms Registry
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Oxford
Ontario
Conservative
Dave MacKenzie Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Safety
Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for his hard work and dedication to ending this wasteful and ineffective long gun registry.
At committee we have heard real police officers with real front line experience and they agree. The registry is not reliable and does not protect police officers.
I call upon the Liberals and NDP, especially those who voted for Bill C-391 at second reading, to listen to their constituents, not the Liberal leader, and keep Bill C-391 as is.
Offshore Drilling
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Nathan Cullen Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, last weekend, British Petroleum announced that its latest plan has failed. Thousands of gallons of oil continue to spew into the ocean unabated and the disaster in the gulf only gets worse.
The fact is that a similar or worse catastrophe could easily happen here. In this country, experts report that after years of deregulation, Canada actually has even weaker environmental laws than those governing the offshore in the U.S.
Will the minister finally take action to close this industry loophole, stop listening to his friends in the oil lobby and get on with the job of protecting Canadians?
Offshore Drilling
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Calgary Centre-North
Alberta
Conservative
Jim Prentice Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, all Canadians are appalled and horrified by what they are seeing in the gulf but my friend overstates the case. He is fully aware that no licences have been issued for drilling in Canada's north, none whatsoever in terms of deep drilling.
He is also fully aware that the National Energy Board is undertaking a very serious review of the environmental standards and public safety standards that will apply to all such future wells.
Canadians can be confident in how this matter is being dealt with.
Offshore Drilling
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Nathan Cullen Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC
Mr. Speaker, soon after the spill, President Obama announced a six month freeze on new drilling and a massive investigation into what exactly what wrong.
Meanwhile, the Conservative government continues to pretend that it was just an isolated accident that cannot happen here. However, the government's own regulator testified that a spill could happen in Canadian waters with the only difference being that it would be worse under our conditions.
Will the minister pull his head out of the tar sands long enough to realize that his agenda of gutting environmental protection and letting industry self-regulate is leading us to catastrophe?
Offshore Drilling
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Mégantic—L'Érable
Québec
Conservative
Christian Paradis Minister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, listening to my colleague, one would almost think that he is hoping for a catastrophe so that he can make some political hay. That is not how it works. As we have said from the beginning, no authorization has been issued for offshore drilling in the Beaufort Sea or arctic waters and no project will begin unless the government is convinced that the environment and the health and safety of workers will be protected.
That being said, we are pleased that President Obama has announced a six-month freeze on assessments because it means that they have come to the same point as us: the National Energy Board will review the entire process and the public will be invited to participate.
Fisheries
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Bloc
Raynald Blais Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC
Mr. Speaker, during the visit by the Standing Committee on Fisheries and Oceans to the Gaspé, the Quebec government called for emergency measures to mitigate the 63% decrease in the snow crab quota in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. The Quebec fisheries minister is calling for more flexibility in the EI system to support fishers, fishers' helpers and factory workers who have been affected by the crab crisis.
Will the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development take action?
Fisheries
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Jonquière—Alma
Québec
Conservative
Jean-Pierre Blackburn Minister of Veterans Affairs and Minister of State (Agriculture)
Mr. Speaker, it is always unfortunate to have to reduce the catch rates in the fisheries, but our priority must be to protect the resource. I think that we must take a cautious approach with an issue like this. We must also think about the future, and according to experts, by 2012, the stocks should be replenished. Also, we are in negotiations with the Government of Quebec to find ways to mitigate the impact this has had on everyone involved.
Fisheries
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Bloc
Raynald Blais Gaspésie—Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC
Mr. Speaker, the federal government is responsible for the current crab crisis, because it mismanaged the resource. Now it must step up and help the 1,000 workers in eastern Quebec who have been affected by this crisis.
Does the government plan on guaranteeing these workers and their families a minimum income by providing financial assistance or by making adjustments to the number of hours required, so that they can qualify for employment insurance?
