Debates of Sept. 28th, 2010
House of Commons Hansard #72 of the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was census.
Topics
- Question Period
- Seniors CPI Protection Act
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Business of Supply
- Bowen Shares
- Baha'i Community in Iran
- Quatre Lieux History and Genealogy Society
- Niagara Food Festival
- Seniors
- Status of Women
- Public Safety
- Louise Bellemare
- Canadian Forces
- Pierre Elliott Trudeau
- Canada's Economic Action Plan
- Disaster Relief
- Aerospace Industry
- Quebec
- Mario Laguë
- Government Spending
- G8 and G20 Summits
- Census
- Oil and Gas Industry
- Census
- Infrastructure
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Post-Secondary Education
- Arts and Culture
- Public Safety
- National Defence
- The Environment
- Government Spending
- Infrastructure
- Health
- Firearms Registry
- Employment Insurance
- Securities
- Status of Women
- The Economy
- Employment Insurance
- Presence in Gallery
- Ways and Means
- Business of Supply
- Citizenship Act
Arts and Culture
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Provencher
Manitoba
Conservative
Vic Toews Minister of Public Safety
Mr. Speaker, as the host nation of unprecedented back-to-back G8 and G20 summits, we are proud of their success.
As we have said all along, the majority of the cost for the summits was security related. Approximately 20,000 security personnel were tasked with safeguarding both summits. Canada was responsible for the safety and security of world leaders, delegates, visitors and Canadians living and working near where the summits took place. We also had the opportunity to showcase Toronto. It was money well spent.
Public Safety
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Liberal
Frank Valeriote Guelph, ON
Mr. Speaker, Conservative priorities are misplaced. Some 10 billion hard-earned taxpayer dollars are being spent on American-style superprisons when crime rates have gone down significantly for two decades.
The Conservatives should be investing in the priorities of Canadian families. In southwest Ontario that means vital improvements and supplying staff to ease border crossings, crucial for the growth of jobs in many Ontario industries and communities.
Why can the minister find $10 billion to satisfy the fetish of the Conservatives for prisons, yet not find the money to speed up our border crossings?
Public Safety
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Provencher
Manitoba
Conservative
Vic Toews Minister of Public Safety
Mr. Speaker, one-quarter of Canadians, 7.4 million people, reported being a victim of crime over the last year. Our Conservative government finds this figure far too high.
The Liberals have it wrong. Dangerous criminals should not be released onto the street just to save a buck. Unlike the opposition, we truly understand the cost to victims and we will continue to work on their behalf even if the Liberals will not.
National Defence
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Conservative
Peter Braid Kitchener—Waterloo, ON
Mr. Speaker, since 1997, Canada has been a participant in the joint strike fighter program. Canada participated in an extensive competitive process to determine who would produce this next generation fighter. The ultimate selection of Lockheed Martin as the manufacturer was made under the previous government in 2001.
Today we heard leaders in the Canadian aerospace industry say how excited they were for the opportunity this represented for them.
Could the Minister of Industry please provide an update on the many benefits of the F-35 program?
National Defence
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, I know the member for Kitchener—Waterloo and members of our party do not understand why the Leader of the Opposition and his party seem to be threatening to cancel this great opportunity for our country and for the Canadian Forces. The forces will acquire a spectacular new aircraft that will be in service until 2051 and the Canadian aerospace firms are ecstatic. They see the benefits, the opportunities and the jobs that will come as a result of these contracts.
What does the Liberal Party have against companies like Avcorp in British Columbia, Magellan in Manitoba, Héroux-Devtek in Montreal or Composites Atlantic in Nova Scotia? What do the Liberals have against giving the men and women of the Canadian Forces the best equipment we can?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Fin Donnelly New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC
Mr. Speaker, British Columbia's Fish Lake is well known for its rainbow trout but soon it may be better known for its 860 million tonnes of toxic mining waste from the proposed Prosperity mine. The Department of Fisheries and Oceans has already advised against the mine because of the environmental damage it would create. Now the Conservative government is considering overriding this advice.
Will the minister do her job and protect Fish Lake?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Egmont
P.E.I.
Conservative
Gail Shea Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
Mr. Speaker, our government is working to advance our response to the environmental review panel report, and that reply will be forthcoming. This is a very serious issue and our response will balance the environmental, economic and social perspectives of this project.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Fin Donnelly New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC
Mr. Speaker, after intensive lobbying, the B.C. government changed its mind and said that it was okay to kill Fish Lake. Taseko has been lobbying the federal government since 2006. In fact, this past summer the company hired four new corporate lobbyists to pressure the Conservatives to allow the lake to be killed.
Will the government reject the corporate lobbying and stand by the decision to protect Fish Lake?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Egmont
P.E.I.
Conservative
Gail Shea Minister of Fisheries and Oceans
Mr. Speaker, we have received much correspondence on both sides of this very serious issue.
What is important is that we take the necessary time to make the right decision in the best interests of the country.
Government Spending
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Bloc
Claude Bachand Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, while the Conservative government did not even try to get guaranteed economic benefits for Quebec, the American government is reviewing contracts already awarded to produce F-35s. This reconsideration suggests that Quebec will benefit even less than anticipated.
My question is for the Conservative members from Quebec. Where are they? Where are they hiding? Can they explain why they are not willing to stand up for the aerospace industry, which is concentrated in Quebec?
Government Spending
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean
Québec
Conservative
Denis Lebel Minister of State (Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec)
Mr. Speaker, today is a good day to talk about F-35s. Several presidents of aerospace companies, many of them from Quebec, were here in Ottawa today to express their support for our government's action. One executive stated: “We have a short window of approximately 24 months to maximize our participation in the full rate production for this aircraft, and any uncertainty or delay creates risks for our industry.”
We are creating jobs.
Government Spending
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Bloc
Claude Bachand Saint-Jean, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Pentagon will use its review of contracts for building F-35s to help American manufacturers. While the Americans are vigorously defending their national interests, the Conservative government seems unable to demand anything at all for Quebec aerospace companies. It seems to me that when the government signs a $16 billion contract, it should be in a position to impose some conditions.
When will this government go to bat for Quebec's aerospace industry?
Government Spending
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Roberval—Lac-Saint-Jean
Québec
Conservative
Denis Lebel Minister of State (Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec)
Mr. Speaker, as my colleague knows, this process started in 1997 and led to a decision made by the former government in 2001. Our government worked with eight other countries. Nine countries pooled armed forces resources to select the best equipment for our armed forces. This will result in billions of dollars in economic spinoffs for the country's aerospace industry, much of which is in Quebec. We keep our promises.
Infrastructure
Oral Questions
September 28th, 2010 / 2:50 p.m.
Liberal
John McCallum Markham—Unionville, ON
Mr. Speaker, on one hand, the Conservatives are saying that they are going to arbitrarily cut funding on March 31; on the other hand, they are saying they will be fair. It would be fair to give an extension to the Pat Burns arena, to the 2-22 Ste-Catherine project in the Quartier des spectacles and to all the other threatened projects in Canada.
Why are they refusing to grant these extensions?
Infrastructure
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Yellowhead
Alberta
Conservative
Rob Merrifield Minister of State (Transport)
Mr. Speaker, I would inform my colleague that there are 23,000 projects across this country. We are working collectively with the municipalities and the provinces. We encourage all these projects to be completed on time. We will work with those provinces and those municipalities in a fair and reasonable way right through to the completion date.
