Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Malpeque for his speech, but his reluctant support of this bill, which is riddled with highly questionable—or even dangerous—provisions, required such an intellectual contortion that I must admit that I am a bit worried about his back and other parts of his body.
For example, the bill opens the door to arbitrary, extrajudicial decisions that would put personal information into all kinds of hands.
How can the member justify this reluctant support, in light of these excessive provisions?