Mr. Speaker, I would like to ask a question that I have asked before because I think that it is important.
The bill we are debating in the House was introduced in response to a Supreme Court decision concerning the government's intention to close a supervised injection site. However, this site has been successful for 10 years because it has improved safety in Vancouver and also saved lives. That cannot be denied. That has been the case for 10 years. There is evidence and facts attesting to its success.
Does the member believe that the bill clearly responds to the Supreme Court of Canada decision?