House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was victims.

Last in Parliament September 2008, as Liberal MP for Nickel Belt (Ontario)

Won his last election, in 2006, with 43% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Bloc Quebecois December 5th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, Quebec daily newspapers were reporting this morning that the next leader of the Bloc Quebecois will be an acting leader and that only the party's general council members will be voting in the election.

How do you like that, a leader who will be there only on a temporary basis, a leader selected by members of the party's establishment, who were themselves appointed by the retiring leader before he accedes to the throne in Quebec? As a result, party members who militated in good faith find themselves excluded from a process as fundamental as the selection of a new leader, with a leader who is leaving but at the same time wants to keep on controlling what happens in his Ottawa branch.

The Bloc Quebecois has not stood the test of time, and this prearranged exercise in democracy does not bode well for Quebec when the new king finally accedes to the throne.

Protection Of Personal Information Obtained By Certain Corporations Act November 30th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, while I agree with the spirit of Bill C-315, I am not in a position to support its content, which I find narrow and burdensome, particularly in consideration of the much broader and flexible measures presently being looked at.

Bill C-315 has a narrow focus when broad based measures are needed to ensure the level playing field for industry while protecting the privacy of Canadians. With advances in information and telecommunication technologies, the privacy of consumers is at risk, but this bill does not provide the type of broad based protection which is necessary.

As part of a global economy, we can expect that cross-border consumer transactions will increase and with them a related growth in direct to home sales of the type which make regular use of mailing lists in order to gain access into the homes of Canadians.

Mailing lists, when combined with other transaction related databases such as credit ratings and financial accounts, can be assembled into profiles of individuals. These records can cross national borders, be exchanged, resold, reused or integrated with other databases, often without consent or remuneration, for purposes unrelated to those for which the data were originally collected.

Consumers are frustrated and angry when subjected to perceived intrusions by commercial interests into their personal domain. Personal information privacy is an issue of considerable importance to Canadians as has been revealed by numerous surveys in recent years.

Bill C-315 has a very narrow focus. It applies only to the sale of lists containing personal information when in reality the normal business practice is the rental of such lists. The bill focuses narrowly on lists when in fact a vast amount of personal data can be blended and put together from the type of consumer transactional data currently exchanged between firms or within large organizations.

The bill only applies to federal corporations when in fact mailing lists and other information is often transferred between provincial corporations, individual proprietorships and partnerships.

If passed, the result would not be a level playing field of clear and consistent privacy rules applying to all sectors, but rather a patchwork quilt of uneven privacy obligations from sector to sector, firm to firm and jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Other initiatives currently under way might provide a better approach. We are currently studying these options. Most notable is the Canadian Standards Association model privacy code. The CSA code sets out 10 principles governing how personal information should be collected, retained, kept up to date, used and disclosed by the private sector.

Adoption of the code by firms using mailing lists would tend to ensure that consumers are informed of the existence of such lists, given the opportunity to consent to their use and verify their accuracy.

The CSA code is voluntary, but I propose and support that it become the basis for flexible framework legislation. The Canadian Direct Marketing Association, the Information Highway Advisory Council and Canada's privacy commissioner all agree. The CSA model privacy code represents a potential basis for the development of flexible national standards.

I agree with the spirit of Bill C-315 and applaud the efforts of the hon. member in this regard. However, I am not in a position to support its contents as I find it too narrow, particularly in consideration of the much broader, flexible and less costly measures available to us.

I will continue to work to convince the government to introduce broad based and enforceable privacy protection for Canadians' personal and financial information in the marketplace. I feel that such legislation is important to my constituents. It is important to all Canadians. The legislation that we can accept must be enforceable, must have teeth and must apply to institutions like banks. It must also consider new technology like the Internet.

I believe that this bill is too narrow and does not create a comprehensive framework to deal with the real privacy concerns of all Canadians. I commend the hon. member for his efforts but I fear that his bill does not go far enough.

Committees Of The House November 22nd, 1995

Madam Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 10th report of the Standing Committee on Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development on Bill C-107, an act respecting the establishment of the British Columbia Treaty Commission, and have agreed to report it without amendment.

Department Of Health Act November 7th, 1995

Madam Speaker, I would like to express my support for Bill C-95.

In this connection, I would like to discuss what Health Canada has accomplished and recall that our country is very proud, and rightly so, of its health care system.

In fact, there is no other system like it in the world. We also have the Canada Health Act, which contains the five basic principles of our system: universality, accessibility, comprehensiveness, portability, and public administration.

Our health system has contributed enormously to our excellent quality of life. Furthermore, co-operation at the international level helps us stay abreast of new advances in health care in many other countries. Thanks to this co-operation, users and providers are informed of what is being done in the rest of the world. All industrialized countries exchange information and, as a result, are able to act efficiently and effectively.

Canada has already introduced a number of measures to help achieve its goal of renewing the health care system. We are reinforcing the community aspect of health care, improving the role of consumers with respect to health care and seeking a more integrated approach to health which goes beyond health care. A large proportion of our present and future interventions is focused on the principal factors that determine our health. A fundamental truth has transpired, and it is that health is more than just care. This is an incentive to understand the complex set of factors that create a society whose members are all in the best possible health.

Governments and communities are examining social, economic, physical and psychological aspects as well as other factors. The work being done in these areas supports and complements the services provided by the regular health care system.

We are beginning to understand the close and complex connections between factors that determine our health, and our decision-making is aimed at improving the quality of health care services. The national forum on health plays an important role in this respect.

In fact, the forum's role is to project a model of health care for the twenty-first century. The forum's team consists of 24 Canadian men and women: health professionals, volunteers and consumers who have come from across the country.

While our appreciation of the complexity of the interrelated factors that contribute to overall health has grown, so too have the challenges in making effective choices about how to allocate increasingly limited resources.

The federal government has taken a leadership role in communicating with all stakeholders, including the public, in terms of the kind of future systems we want and can afford. The national forum on health will play an important role in this regard.

If we are to preserve and improve our health care system we must first decide what is essential. In this regard the national forum on health and other bodies will provide important advice to the government.

One of the jobs of the members of the forum is to engage in honest and open discussions with Canadians about influences on our health and on our health care system in the coming years.

Four working groups have already been set up and are responsible for various aspects: decisions based on convincing evidence, health determiners, values and achieving a balance.

The forum was set up in response to Canadians' concerns, and Canadians are justifiably proud of their health system.

The forum is trying to find ways to improve both the health of Canadians and the effectiveness and efficiency of health care services, and public participation is vital to the fulfilment of its mandate.

Through a range of activities, the members of the forum are informing the public about the problems and the options for improvement of health and health care services in Canada.

The forum's broad public consultation will enable all Canadians to help develop recommendations.

Every Canadian will have an opportunity to express his or her values and convictions.

The federal government is also working in concert with its provincial and territorial counterparts through the conference of ministers of health. One of our common priorities in order to enhance the appropriateness and quality of health care has been to promote and strengthen the use of clinical practise guidelines. We want to orient health care on which practices work best for different groups at risk.

I would also like to point out that Canada is renowned worldwide as a centre for research, treatment and pharmaceutical developments.

Specifically, our country is a leader in the area of chemotherapy. Throughout the world, researchers and practitioners are investing in work of great significance to the millions of Canadians suffering from cancer or an infectious disease, and to those who are at their side in their struggle. The work done so far has had tangible results.

In 1990 approximately 413,000 Canadians who had been diagnosed with cancer within the previous decade were still alive. More than one-third of these people had lived more than five years since their initial diagnosis. Many of them had chemotherapy to thank for their success in fighting cancer. This year alone a further 125,000 Canadians will be diagnosed with cancer. They will look to advances in treatment such as chemotherapy for answers and hope.

In addition to chemotherapy, vaccines play another important role in our public health efforts. For example, while the hepatitis B vaccine is used successfully in the prevention of infection it also prevents the development of cancer of the liver. Another example is the BCG vaccine which is accepted as a therapeutic agent for treating cancer of the bladder and is also known to be used in the prevention of tuberculosis especially in countries where the incidence of tuberculosis is high.

We also know that the appearance of resistant strains in the case of tuberculosis, for instance, is a cause of grave concern among public health authorities.

In a world in which international travel has become commonplace, experience has shown that the progress we have made in fighting infectious diseases within our borders is no longer enough.

These factors are so many reasons why Canada puts such emphasis on health issues. Many of our health care priorities centre on the use of chemotherapy.

Health Canada is both a partner and a facilitator in medical research and efforts deployed in the public health sector in Canada.

This is an indication of the importance of progress achieved thanks to research and the government's resolve to continue this work.

The federal role in research has been generally well accepted in this country. Provincial research programs have frequently developed their own provincial research councils around the federal council to avoid overlap while ensuring their own research goals are met.

One of the best examples of the provincial research model is that of Quebec. Some hon. members may not be aware that one of the chief architects of the conseil de recherches, now the fonds de recherches, is the present Quebec minister of health, Jean Rochon. Mr. Rochon is a former dean of medicine at the University of Laval as well as the chair of the external advisory committee for Health Canada's national health research development program. He is also the author of the Rochon report and has worked for the World Health Organization. I suppose it is not surprising that research in Mr. Rochon's province is so well organized.

Contacts at the international level play a key role in the process. These contacts are long established, and we now have many mechanisms to help us overcome the barriers of time and space and work as a team to conquer disease.

Madam Speaker, just think what Pasteur would have accomplished with the help of Internet! Whether we are talking about cancer or infectious diseases, the entire population of this planet benefits from the co-operation of Health Canada with all concerned. I believe that together we will be able to make the requisite changes in our cherished health care system and bring it into the next century. I think we are on the right track.

I would now like to quote an old Arab saying: "He who has health has hope; he who has hope lacks nothing". With the help of all concerned, Canadians will keep both health and hope.

First Nations November 6th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to ask my colleagues to join with me in congratulating these aboriginal Canadian communities: the James Bay Cree, the Walpole Island First Nations and the Sanikiluak Inuit community.

Recently these three communities were honoured by the United Nations for their achievements in overcoming great hardships to improve the quality of life of the members of their communities.

As recipients of the United Nations award "We the Peoples" our three aboriginal communities were held up as models to others facing hardships. The award serves as a testimony to the ability of

communities to come together under a common banner to promote positive change in the harshest of circumstances.

I thank the peoples of the James Bay Cree, the Walpole Island First Nations and the Sanikiluak Inuit community for reinforcing our hope and resolve in bettering the lives of aboriginal Canadians from coast to coast.

Quebec Referendum October 26th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, in his address to the nation, the Prime Minister said that the vote on Monday will determine the future not only of Quebec but also of Canada as a whole, adding that the consequences of this decision cannot be foreseen or measured.

This is a very serious warning. It clearly shows what is really at stake in the referendum. On Monday, the people of Quebec will not be voting on some way of renewing federalism or on a vague offer of partnership. They will have to decide whether or not they want Quebec to break away from Canada and become a foreign country. They will have to decide if they are prepared to abandon their history and heritage.

The people of Quebec must know that by voting Yes on October 30, they will become strangers in their own land.

Status Of Women October 25th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, at the recent women's conference in Beijing, Canada was awarded the global award by the International Federation of Business and Professional Women.

Can the hon. Secretary of State for the Status of Women explain to us what this award means and on what basis Canada was selected to receive this prestigious prize?

Canadian Citizenship October 24th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, the honours and advantages Canadian citizenship confers upon Canadians are too numerous to list. Our country is a model for the international community and the envy of hundreds of millions of people.

Canada could not have become the great country it is without the will and determination of the women and men, in Quebec and in the other provinces, who have worked unceasingly to attain the common goal of constructing a country in our image.

The wonderful thing about Canada is that it allows all of us to be proud of our status as Canadians, while not preventing us from being proud at the same time to be francophones, anglophones, and Quebecers.

This coming October 30, the people of Quebec will renew with pride their confidence in, and attachment to, Canada by voting no.

Francophones Outside Quebec October 18th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, yesterday certain Bloc members spoke in this House in an attempt to have us believe that francophones outside Quebec would be better protected by a sovereign Quebec. The hon. member for Rimouski-Témiscouata stated: "The status quo is untenable for the survival and development of the French fact in North America; only a sovereign Quebec can enable us to work toward this".

I feel it is appropriate to remind the official opposition, along with the hundreds of thousands of francophones outside Quebec, that one of the first decisions taken by the Parti Quebecois after its election was to close Quebec's office in Edmonton. According to the PQ minister the reason for this decision was financial. On October 30, Quebecers will not abandon francophones outside Quebec, and that is why they will vote no.

Franco-Ontarian Flag October 6th, 1995

Mr. Speaker, I rise to invite my Liberal, Bloc and Reform colleagues and all the other members present today to join with me in congratulating Franco-Ontarians on the 20th anniversary of their flag.

On September 25, I had the honour of participating in a ceremony at the University of Sudbury, in my riding, to honour the Franco-Ontarian flag and to celebrate the contribution made by Franco-Ontarians to Canada and to our shared heritage.

Since September 25, 1975, the date of its birth, the Franco-Ontarian flag has become an important symbol of our accomplishments, our culture and our language. Today, Franco-Ontarians continue to grow and develop within a strong and united Canada.

Franco-Ontarians, all proud Canadians, first and foremost, owe a large debt to their predecessors, to those who created the flag and to the University of Sudbury.