Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 12556-12570 of 13117
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

The Environment  If rural Canadians heat their home with oil, the Liberal message is: shift happens. If the Liberals succeed with their carbon tax trick, Canadians will be: shift out of luck.

June 18th, 2008House debate

Jason KenneyConservative

Gasoline Prices  What we will not do and what will clearly hurt Canadian families is go around imposing carbon taxes at this time on all kinds of fuel. The Leader of the Opposition told his own party during the leadership race that he would never impose a carbon tax, that it was bad policy. It is not surprising that all those leadership rivals have left the country this week.

June 18th, 2008House debate

Stephen HarperConservative

Points of Order  I might just quote this: That the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food study the effects of a carbon tax and any other broad based environmental tax and ensure that Canadian farmers are not saddled with a carbon tax which would further increase their input costs and hurt their competitiveness.

June 17th, 2008House debate

Guy LauzonConservative

Agriculture  Could the agriculture minister tell the House how the Liberal leader's plan for this new massive carbon tax would also affect farmers in my riding and across Canada?

June 17th, 2008House debate

Brian StorsethConservative

Natural Resources committee  And while I'll grant you that some of the mills have converted to using biomass, once the costs start working their way back into the food chain or to the inputs that are coming into those mills, a carbon tax on the fuel is going to grind these people right to a halt. I'm just amazed to be hearing some of the statements I'm hearing, especially when other countries now are very much debating how positive these carbon taxes are—as is rural B.C., as well.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Mike AllenConservative

Natural Resources committee  I do not think we have to have a clear precise opinion on this motion immediately. This is a very complex subject and we have to look at what the consequences of a carbon tax would be. Should we do as Quebec, as British Columbia, or as Europe is proposing? There are so many ways of acting. What are we talking about when we talk about a carbon tax? We do not know, but we are about to vote for or against!

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Christian OuelletBloc

Natural Resources committee  Okay: A carbon tax will have a negative impact on Canada's traditional industries, like forestry, and will eliminate jobs. The committee recommends, therefore, that the federal government reject any plans for new carbon taxes.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

The Clerk

Natural Resources committee  Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I agree with Mr. Alghabra that the carbon tax is ridiculous, but I do wish to correct the record, in that the Standing Committee on Agriculture put forth the motion that they study the negative effects of a carbon tax or a broad-based environment tax.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Cheryl GallantConservative

Natural Resources committee  The committee recommends, therefore, that the federal government reject any plans for new carbon taxes. Mr. Chair, I am more than willing to amend it to eliminate a lot of the more flowery language in the centre. I would be more than willing if the committee would see fit to amend it so that it says that the committee report the following to the House at the earliest opportunity—

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Bradley TrostConservative

Agriculture committee  He's not sure if it's a green shift or a tax or what it is. I believe that what was done in British Columbia was a carbon tax. It was called a carbon tax. And I believe this is the wording that should be used.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Brian StorsethConservative

Agriculture committee  I'll read it one more time: That the Standing Committee on Agriculture and Agri-Food study the effects of a carbon tax or any broad-based environmental tax and ensure Canadian farmers are not saddled with a carbon tax which would further increase their input costs and hurt their competitiveness. Does everybody understand the terms of the amendment?

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

The ChairConservative

Agriculture committee  Lauzon's motion has absolutely no urgency attached to it, and unless his government decides to bring in a carbon tax, there's absolutely no potential for a carbon tax to be foisted on farmers over the summer, over the fall, and not until after the next election. I would ask for unanimous consent, Mr.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Lloyd St. AmandLiberal

Agriculture committee  It's my understanding, and I think it's the understanding of the Canadian public, that the Liberal Party is, as soon as tomorrow, introducing a proposed carbon tax. My agricultural people and other people, as a matter of fact, in eastern Canada have told me that the proposed carbon tax would devastate agriculture, and I don't want to see that happen.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Guy LauzonConservative

Agriculture committee  I think the motion is pretty clear. It says that this is “to ensure that Canadian farmers are not saddled with a carbon tax that would further increase their input costs”. The agricultural people tell me that in everything they do, a carbon tax would affect anything getting to them, when they're producing it and also when they're delivering it to market.

June 17th, 2008Committee meeting

Guy LauzonConservative

Liberal Party of Canada  Speaker, I have been hearing rumours that the Liberal leader will finally unveil the details of his massive national carbon tax next week, the tax trick that will raise the cost of everything for all Canadians. However, Liberal MPs are deeply divided and there is infighting over the Liberal leader's plan to sell a tax on everything to Canadians this summer.

June 13th, 2008House debate

Rick NorlockConservative