An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing)

This bill is from the 38th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in November 2005.

Sponsor

Jay Hill  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Nov. 1, 2004
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-235 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing)
C-235 (39th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing)
C-247 (37th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing)
C-247 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing)
C-238 (37th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-257s:

C-257 (2022) An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act (protecting against discrimination based on political belief)
C-257 (2020) An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (closed containment aquaculture)
C-257 (2016) An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (sugar content labelling)
C-257 (2013) An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (mandatory labelling for genetically modified foods)
C-257 (2011) An Act to amend the Food and Drugs Act (mandatory labelling for genetically modified foods)
C-257 (2010) Labour Market Training, Apprenticeship and Certification Act

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

November 1st, 2004 / 3:25 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Jay Hill Conservative Prince George—Peace River, BC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-257, an act to amend the Criminal Code (conditional sentencing).

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague from Provencher for seconding the bill. I am very pleased to re-introduce it into this Parliament. It is a private member's bill that I have introduced in two previous Parliaments.

This legislation addresses the frequent misuse of conditional sentencing provisions in the Criminal Code of Canada. If passed, the bill will ensure that certain serious and violent offences such as murder, assault, sexual assault, kidnapping, drug trafficking, manslaughter, et cetera are excluded from consideration for conditional sentencing. This means the convict must and will serve jail time.

When the government passed into law the conditional sentencing provision in 1995, it ignored warnings, without clear instructions to judges, that killers and other violent offenders could literally get away with murder. As we all know, this is exactly what has been happening across Canada ever since.

It is bad enough when those convicted of crimes such as break and enter and theft are granted conditional sentences, there is no punishment, no consequences, nothing to prevent them from offending again. Yet when a killer, or a rapist, or a drug dealer receives a “get out of jail free” card, for their victims and their victim's families, it is like being assaulted again.

Just over a week ago in the House the Deputy Prime Minister suggested she was willing to look at aspects--