An Act to amend the Competition Act (investigations by Commissioner and class proceedings) and to make a related amendment to another Act

This bill is from the 38th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in November 2005.

Sponsor

Pat Martin  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of May 12, 2005
(This bill did not become law.)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-387s:

C-387 (2024) An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan
C-387 (2017) Via Rail Canada Act
C-387 (2013) Leif Erikson Day Act
C-387 (2012) Leif Erikson Day Act

Competition ActRoutine Proceedings

May 12th, 2005 / 10:05 a.m.


See context

NDP

Pat Martin NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-387, an act to amend the Competition Act (investigations by Commissioner and class proceedings) and to make a related amendment to another Act.

Mr. Speaker, it again gives me great pleasure to introduce a bill that we have been working on for some time in consultation with a number of stakeholder groups across the country.

The bill would make changes to the Competition Act regarding the investigation by the commissioner and also regarding class action suits.

The interesting change that the bill would make is that the commissioner of competition would be able to cause an inquiry upon application by 100 or more persons who are of the view that there exists in any sector of the Canadian economy an arrangement or relationship that may constitute an offence. In other words, the commissioner would be allowed to take action and undertake a full inquiry on a petition of 100 or more Canadians who are of that view.

Just as critically, it also would provide that class actions for compensation by any of those who under normal circumstances can demonstrate that they have suffered losses as a result of a contravention of provisions of the act, that such class actions would be allowed an avenue of redress for those who may feel that they have suffered damages under an absence of competition.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)