An Act to amend the Competition Act (abuse of dominant position)

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2002.

Sponsor

Dan McTeague  Liberal

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Feb. 21, 2001
(This bill did not become law.)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-276s:

C-276 (2022) An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (replacement workers)
C-276 (2021) Hellenic Heritage Month Act
C-276 (2016) Extending the Time Limit for a Blood Sample Warrant Act (Helen's Law)
C-276 (2013) An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (gender identity and gender expression)
C-276 (2011) An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (gender identity and gender expression)
C-276 (2010) Workplace Psychological Harassment Prevention Act

Competition ActRoutine Proceedings

February 21st, 2001 / 3:15 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Dan McTeague Liberal Pickering—Ajax—Uxbridge, ON

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-276, an act to amend the Competition Act (abuse of dominant position).

Mr. Speaker, I am please to reintroduce a bill dealing with changes to the Competition Act, most specifically section 78 dealing with abuse of dominance.

Recently growing consolidation and concentration throughout a variety of industries, most specifically in the retail sector, have led to a number of abuses, particularly of suppliers. Currently the Competition Act deals with the notion and the concept of monopoly and oligopoly but does not deal with the more technical question of oligopsony or monopsony.

As a result the bill would provide more teeth to the Competition Act to ensure that items such as high listing fees, trade allowances, et cetera, would be prohibited and would have, at least in their purpose, result or the intent, a competitive and a less harmful outcome for consumers and Canadians as a whole.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)