An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared parenting)

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2002.

Sponsor

Jay Hill  Canadian Alliance

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of May 31, 2002
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-245 (38th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared parenting)
C-245 (37th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared parenting)
C-245 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Divorce Act (shared parenting)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-469s:

C-469 (2019) An Act to amend the Parks Canada Agency Act (Canada’s tentative list for world heritage protection)
C-469 (2013) Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
C-469 (2013) Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
C-469 (2010) Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights
C-469 (2009) Canadian Environmental Bill of Rights
C-469 (2007) An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (use of phosphorus)

Divorce ActRoutine Proceedings

May 31st, 2002 / 12:05 p.m.


See context

Canadian Alliance

Jay Hill Canadian Alliance Prince George—Peace River, BC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-469, an act to amend the Divorce Act (shared parenting).

Madam Speaker, I would like to thank my hon. colleague from Fraser Valley for seconding this important bill.

The purpose of the bill is to amend the Divorce Act so that in the event of separation or divorce the court will grant child custody to both parents, except in cases of proof of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or if it is not in the best interests of the child.

All too often children are used as pawns during emotional divorce proceedings. The bill would stop that by putting both parents on an equal footing. Automatic joint custody would increase the probability of support payment compliance, reduce court appearances by one parent trying to gain access to their child and reduce the likelihood of one parent denying the right of the other to see their children.

Four years ago a special joint committee on child custody and access recommended that shared parenting be included in new legislation. It is yet to be introduced. Children are still waiting for this government to act.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)