An Act to amend the Criminal Code (judicial review)

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 3rd session, which ended in May 2004.

Sponsor

Gary Lunn  Canadian Alliance

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Feb. 2, 2004
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-223 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (judicial review)
C-450 (37th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (judicial review)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-223s:

C-223 (2021) National Framework for a Guaranteed Livable Basic Income Act
C-223 (2020) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (adequate knowledge of French in Quebec)
C-223 (2020) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (adequate knowledge of French in Quebec)
C-223 (2016) Canadian Organ Donor Registry Act
C-223 (2013) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (gratuities)
C-223 (2011) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (gratuities)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

October 9th, 2002 / 3:15 p.m.


See context

Canadian Alliance

Gary Lunn Canadian Alliance Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-223, an act to amend the Criminal Code (judicial review).

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to introduce my private member's bill to amend section 745.6 of the Criminal Code. This section, the so-called faint hope clause, allows those convicted of life in prison without eligibility of parole for 25 years to use a legislated back door and apply after only 15 years. Some 82% of those applicants are successful. Murderers are walking on our streets early as a result.

My amendment would increase the period for judicial review from 15 years to 100 years. This would effectively eliminate this ill-considered and insulting law.

It is time we stopped obstructing justice and started obstructing this terrible criminal loop-hole.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)