Bill C-290 (Historical)

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 3rd session, which ended in May 2004.

Sponsor

Peter MacKay  Progressive Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Feb. 2, 2004
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-339 (38th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)
C-290 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)
C-274 (37th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Order of prohibition)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-290s:

C-290 (2022) Public Sector Integrity Act
C-290 (2021) Soil Conservation Act
C-290 (2016) Modernizing Access to Product Information Act
C-290 (2013) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sports betting)
C-290 (2011) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (sports betting)
C-290 (2010) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (tax credit for loss of retirement income)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

November 4th, 2002 / 3:05 p.m.


See context

Progressive Conservative

Peter MacKay Progressive Conservative Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, NS

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-290, an act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition).

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from St. John's East for his support on this.

The purpose of the bill would be to amend section 161 of the Criminal Code where an offender is convicted of a sexual offence. The enactment currently permits the court to make an order prohibiting the offender from being in a number of enunciated places in the Criminal Code, including a schoolyard or playground. This would add to that list the term dwelling house, where the offender knows or ought to know that a person under the age of 14 is present and a person who has custody or control of the person under the age of 14 is not present. It would require that an adult be present when there is a sexual offender in the dwelling house. Again, this is for the protection of children.

The impetus for the bill was Ms. Goler, who was a victim in the province of Nova Scotia many years ago in a dwelling house.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)