An Act to amend the Radiocommunication Act

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 3rd session, which ended in May 2004.

Sponsor

Gary Lunn  Canadian Alliance

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Feb. 2, 2004
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-467 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Radiocommunication Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-467s:

C-467 (2019) Royal Canadian Mounted Police Day Act
C-467 (2013) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-467 (2012) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-467 (2010) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (children born abroad)
C-467 (2009) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (children born abroad)
C-467 (2007) An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (medical equipment)

Radiocommunication ActRoutine Proceedings

November 5th, 2003 / 3:35 p.m.


See context

Canadian Alliance

Gary Lunn Canadian Alliance Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-467, an act to amend the Radiocommunication Act.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to introduce a bill to amend the Radiocommunication Act with respect to antenna tower policy review. Radio tower placement is becoming an increasing problem across Canada. Striking a balance between the many competing interests in this field is not easy.

This bill would do three things. It would require radio tower proponents to commit to shared usage whenever possible. Exceptions would apply for amateur operators for whom shared usage is simply not possible. It would increase the ability of local land use authorities like municipalities to decide what is approved within their jurisdictions. Finally and most important, it would streamline the approval process and allow swift action by Industry Canada to stop those who contravene the conditions of their licences.

The lack of legislative clarity in this area is obvious. It is time for the government to act. We need fair regulations that are enforceable. My bill would provide this. I ask all hon. members to support it.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)