An Act to amend the Railway Safety Act (visibility of railway equipment)

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 3rd session, which ended in May 2004.

Sponsor

Brian Pallister  Canadian Alliance

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of April 1, 2004
(This bill did not become law.)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-511s:

C-511 (2013) An Act to amend the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act (period of residence)
C-511 (2013) An Act to amend the Federal-Provincial Fiscal Arrangements Act (period of residence)
C-511 (2010) Proactive Enforcement and Defect Accountability Legislation (PEDAL) Act
C-511 (2008) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (means of communication for child luring)

Railway Safety ActRoutine Proceedings

April 1st, 2004 / 10:10 a.m.


See context

Canadian Alliance

Brian Pallister Canadian Alliance Portage—Lisgar, MB

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-511, an act to amend the Railway Safety Act (visibility of railway equipment).

Mr. Speaker, it gives me pleasure to present my private member's bill today, though it is as a result of a tragedy in my riding that I do so.

Last November a car, in which a young man was a passenger, collided with the side of a freight train that was not equipped with proper retro reflective equipment and therefore was not visible to the driver of the car. As a result of that accident, I learned that less than one in five Canadian rail cars is so equipped.

Every working day in Canada there is a collision between a car and a train, every week someone is killed and every week a Canadian is seriously injured as a result.

What the bill would do, quite simply, is require that the companies apply the proper retro reflective equipment to the trains, that it be repaired and maintained regularly and replaced when it is damaged.

This is a common sense proposal, which I have discussed with members of each of the other parties in the House. I have consulted with the critics of each of the parties and they are in support of the motion. I have also consulted with the House leaders. I think you would find, Mr. Speaker, if you were to ask, that there would be unanimous consent for the bill to be deemed read a second time and forwarded to the committee for consideration.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)