An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)

This bill is from the 38th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in November 2005.

Sponsor

Peter MacKay  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Feb. 25, 2005
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-290 (37th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)
C-290 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)
C-274 (37th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Order of prohibition)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-339s:

C-339 (2023) An Act to amend the Competition Act (efficiencies defence)
C-339 (2017) An Act to amend the Canadian Forces Members and Veterans Re-establishment and Compensation Act (death benefit)
C-339 (2013) Condemnation of Russian Corruption Act
C-339 (2011) Condemnation of Russian Corruption Act
C-339 (2010) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (maximum - special benefits)
C-339 (2009) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (maximum - special benefits)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

February 25th, 2005 / 12:10 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Peter MacKay Conservative Central Nova, NS

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-339, an act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition).

Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present to the House a private member's bill that would amend the Criminal Code of Canada.

This enactment would change Criminal Code section 163 pertaining to the court orders that may be made with respect to the prohibition of an offender attending certain places. This would amend that section to include “dwelling house”, where an offender knows or ought to know that a person under the age of 14 years is present and that a parent, guardian or other person who has lawful charge of that person under the age of 14 is not present.

This bill was initiated by a woman by the name of Donna Goler from Nova Scotia. A very sad situation involving that family brought her to propose this type of amendment. Therefore, I would ask members to support this legislation, which is aimed specifically at helping children where sexual abuse most often occurs, which is in a dwelling house.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)