An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses)

This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in October 2007.

Sponsor

Massimo Pacetti  Liberal

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of June 21, 2006
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-303 (40th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses)
C-303 (40th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses)
C-342 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses)
C-462 (38th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses)
C-303 (37th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses for a motor vehicle used by a forestry worker)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-342s:

C-342 (2023) An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (maximum security offenders)
C-342 (2017) An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (carbon levy)
C-342 (2013) An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (funeral arrangements)
C-342 (2011) An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (funeral arrangements)
C-342 (2010) Nowruz Day Act
C-342 (2009) Nowruz Day Act

Income Tax ActRoutine Proceedings

June 21st, 2006 / 3:45 p.m.

Liberal

Massimo Pacetti Liberal Saint-Léonard—Saint-Michel, QC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-342, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses).

Mr. Speaker, how many Canadians, prior to choosing a travel destination, even consider travelling to a Canadian destination? The purpose of the bill is to make that decision a much easier one for Canadians.

Mr. Speaker, today I am pleased to present a bill to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses). This bill provides a maximum deduction of $1,000 from a taxpayer's income in respect of the expenses of purchasing tickets for the taxpayer or members of the taxpayer's family for travel by airplane, train or bus if the travel involves crossing at least three different provincial boundaries.

As former chairman of the finance committee, I had the opportunity to travel across Canada and I wondered how many Canadians get to visit all corners of this vast country of ours.

The bill will have Canadians thinking about choosing travel within Canada first, and second, the bill will promote national unity by allowing Canadians to learn more about their fellow citizens.

It can only have a positive effect on local economies. With additional money spent during these trips, this private member's bill would be revenue neutral for the finance department.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

Income Tax ActRoutine Proceedings

June 21st, 2006 / 3:45 p.m.

Bloc

Caroline St-Hilaire Bloc Longueuil—Pierre-Boucher, QC

Mr. Speaker, following consultations with my colleagues from all political parties, I think you will find unanimous consent for the following motion:

That, in the opinion of this House, the government should designate August 23 as International Day for the Remembrance of the Slave Trade and its Abolition.

This day of commemoration is intended to etch the tragedy of the slave trade in our collective memory so that we remember all these human dramas that marked the lives of millions of people around the world.

Income Tax ActRoutine Proceedings

June 21st, 2006 / 3:50 p.m.

NDP

Libby Davies NDP Vancouver East, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I would like to advise the member that there has been no unanimous consent. There have been some discussions, but it has not yet gone to all parties. I have made it clear that we are prepared to support this motion if there is also an NDP motion dealing with recognition of Filipino Canadians. There is no unanimous consent and the member is aware of that. We need to have--

Income Tax ActRoutine Proceedings

June 21st, 2006 / 3:50 p.m.

The Speaker Peter Milliken

It is clear there is no consent, so the Chair will not put the motion to the House at this moment.