An Act to amend the Competition Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (right to repair)

This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in October 2007.

Sponsor

Brian Masse  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of April 17, 2007
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-273 (40th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Competition Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (right to repair)
C-425 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Competition Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (right to repair)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-425s:

C-425 (2019) Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Awareness Day Act
C-425 (2013) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (honouring the Canadian Armed Forces)
C-425 (2012) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (honouring the Canadian Armed Forces)
C-425 (2010) Foreign Credential Recognition Act
C-425 (2009) Foreign Credential Recognition Act

Competition ActRoutine Proceedings

April 17th, 2007 / 10:35 a.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-425, An Act to amend the Competition Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (right to repair).

Mr. Speaker, I am proud to bring forward a bill that I believe all members can support. It is the right to repair bill and looks at two different acts, the Competition Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

This bill is important because of the change in the auto industry with regard to on-board diagnostic equipment. That change has led to a number of different servicing requirements that are necessary.

I would point out that the Canadian auto industry is not alone in terms of the consequences of this bill. Similar legislation in the United States and in Europe has adapted different techniques to deal with the fact that this new type of technology creates problems for people and consumers who service their vehicles. Hence, this bill would allow the proper process and procedure so that independent automobile associations could procure the data, tools and materials necessary to fix vehicles.

It is important for competition as well as for the environment. That is one of the reasons that Pollution Probe and the Canadian Automobile Association are supporting this bill. I would suggest that all members of the House get behind this bill in order to have a good, progressive change.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)