Fisheries Act, 2007

An Act respecting the sustainable development of Canada's seacoast and inland fisheries

This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in October 2007.

Sponsor

Loyola Hearn  Conservative

Status

Second reading (House), as of June 5, 2007
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment repeals and replaces the Fisheries Act. It seeks to provide for the sustainable development of Canadian fisheries and fish habitat in collaboration with fishers, the provinces, aboriginal groups and other Canadians.
It sets out management principles governing the exercise of responsibilities under the Act, and provides tools and authorities to improve the ability of the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans to properly manage fisheries and fish habitat.
Part 1 establishes a regime for the proper management and control of fisheries. It allows the Minister to stabilize access and allocation in fisheries, issue fishing licences, conclude agreements with groups that participate in a fishery and issue fisheries management orders.
Part 2 provides for the conservation and protection of fish and fish habitat.
Part 3 provides for the control and management of aquatic invasive species.
Part 4 provides the necessary powers to administer and enforce the Act.
Part 5 establishes the Canada Fisheries Tribunal and sets out a system of licence sanctions for fisheries violations to be administered by that Tribunal, which will also consider appeals of licence decisions.
Part 6 provides for regulations and other related matters required for the administration of the Act.
Part 7 sets out transitional provisions, consequential amendments and coordinating amendments and repeals certain other Acts.

Similar bills

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-45s:

C-45 (2023) Law An Act to amend the First Nations Fiscal Management Act, to make consequential amendments to other Acts, and to make a clarification relating to another Act
C-45 (2017) Law Cannabis Act
C-45 (2014) Law Appropriation Act No. 4, 2014-15
C-45 (2012) Law Jobs and Growth Act, 2012
C-45 (2010) Law Appropriation Act No. 3, 2010-2011
C-45 (2009) An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act

Votes

May 30, 2007 Failed That the motion be amended by deleting all the words after the word "That" and substituting the following: “Bill C-45, An Act respecting the sustainable development of Canada's seacoast and inland fisheries, be not now read a second time but that it be read a second time this day six months hence.”.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

NDP

Pat Martin NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

Mr. Speaker, in answer to my colleague from Yukon and the concern he raises about placer mining, as he knows, I had a placer mining claim in Yukon Territory at Benson Creek on the Dempster Highway.

I am well aware of the rules if a person disrupts flowing water for the purposes of placer mining. There has to be a series of settling ponds wherein the water runs clear by the time it has finished the operation.

In terms of interrupting the fishery, consultation is the answer. My colleague from Yukon I think would agree that with adequate consultation and accommodation of the concerns raised there can be an active placer mining operation and there can be fish habitat protection.

The first question my colleague asked was about the Wheat Board, a subject dear to my heart. I know we are going to hear more about it later tonight from the member for Malpeque. He is doing a late show on this very subject.

I come from the inner city of Winnipeg where the Wheat Board has its head office. We do not have too many head offices in the province of Manitoba and in downtown Winnipeg or anywhere in the west, this is true, but we do have the Canadian Wheat Board located there.

It is shocking to me that the government, because of some ideological crusade that it is on, would contemplate wiping out the Canadian Wheat Board, wiping out this great prairie institution without allowing farmers their statutorily protected right to a vote, first of all. I used the term “fascist” earlier and I was chided for doing so, so I will not do so again.

Is that not like a fascist state, to deny somebody their statutorily protected right to vote? Then when the government did grudgingly allow the barley growers and producers the right to vote, it gerrymandered the voters list, so it did not let everybody vote.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

Liberal

Jean-Claude D'Amours Liberal Madawaska—Restigouche, NB

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my colleague for his speech.

Where I come from, in the region of Madawaska—Restigouche, or close to there, a toxic waste incinerator, the Bennett incinerator in Belledune, could very well open at some point. My constituents, especially those in Restigouche, hope that this will not happen.

We are talking about amending the Fisheries Act. Let us not forget that the incinerator is very close to the ocean. In fact, it borders Chaleur Bay and thus the ocean as well. When we look at the situation and the protection of the environment and of the people and communities along the coast, we can see that it is important to have the necessary tools to ensure the people will be defended. It is also important for the people to be respected. They do not want to have an incinerator burning toxic waste from another country. We know what could happen in Belledune. The waste could come from the United States and would be burned in the Province of New Brunswick.

I am wondering whether the member thinks that this Fisheries Act is strict enough to avoid problems and avoid having the people pay with their quality of life.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

NDP

Pat Martin NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

Mr. Speaker, I would simply thank my colleague for the question regarding the incinerator on the Baie-des-Chaleurs. Let me assure him that my colleague from Acadie—Bathurst has raised this time and time again. There was not enough consultation, not enough teeth or protection in this bill to ensure against the violation or the degradation of habitat. Nobody asked the fish if they wanted a toxic incinerator plunked down there. Believe me, there was no consultation.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

Resuming debate.

Is the House ready for the question?

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

The question is on the amendment. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment?

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

All those in favour of the amendment will please say yea.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

All those opposed will please say nay.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

Call in the members.

And the bells having rung:

Fisheries Act, 2007Government Orders

May 29th, 2007 / 5:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bill Blaikie

There has been a request by the official opposition that the vote be deferred until the end of government orders tomorrow.

The House resumed from May 29 consideration of the motion that Bill C-45, An Act respecting the sustainable development of Canada's seacoast and inland fisheries, be read the second time and referred to a committee, and of the amendment.