An Act to amend the Patent Act (infringement of a patent)

This bill is from the 40th Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in December 2009.

Sponsor

Brian Masse  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Jan. 29, 2009
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-275 (40th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Patent Act (infringement of a patent)
C-349 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Patent Act
C-349 (39th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Patent Act
C-274 (38th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Patent Act
C-460 (37th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Patent Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-275s:

C-275 (2022) An Act to amend the Health of Animals Act (biosecurity on farms)
C-275 (2021) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel expenses deduction for tradespersons)
C-275 (2016) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (business transfer)
C-275 (2013) An Act to amend the Hazardous Products Act (recreational snow sport helmets)
C-275 (2011) An Act to amend the Hazardous Products Act (recreational snow sport helmets)

Patent ActRoutine Proceedings

January 29th, 2009 / 10:15 a.m.

NDP

Brian Masse NDP Windsor West, ON

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-275, An Act to amend the Patent Act (infringement of a patent).

Mr. Speaker, drug prices are rising quickly in Canada and although our drug prices are still lower than some other OECD nations, ours are rising faster than all those other countries. For example, drug costs have increased by close to 300% between 1985 and 2000.

We would actually mirror a system that has been changed in the United States. We would stop the automatic injunctions right now, where generic drugs are blocked to get on to the market; something that even President Bush fixed over in the American system. That just shows members how extreme the Canadian model is right now. We are behind the Bush administration in terms of changing and protecting its consumers in the United States.

I would ask that this government support this bill, so that we can make sure that drug costs are brought to bear and we can actually put money toward our health care system in a better and more efficient way.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)