An Act to amend the Criminal Code (identity theft and related misconduct)

This bill is from the 40th Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in December 2009.

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to create offences of identity theft, trafficking in identity information and unlawful possession or trafficking in certain government-issued identity documents, to clarify and expand certain offences related to identity theft and identity fraud, to exempt certain persons from liability for certain forgery offences, and to allow for an order that the offender make restitution to a victim of identity theft or identity fraud for the expenses associated with rehabilitating their identity.

Similar bills

C-27 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (identity theft and related misconduct)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other S-4s:

S-4 (2022) Law An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Identification of Criminals Act and to make related amendments to other Acts (COVID-19 response and other measures)
S-4 (2021) An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other Acts
S-4 (2016) Law Tax Convention and Arrangement Implementation Act, 2016
S-4 (2014) Law Digital Privacy Act

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2009 / 4:25 p.m.

NDP

Jim Maloway NDP Elmwood—Transcona, MB

Mr. Speaker, that is the shortest question I have heard any lawyer in the chamber ask since I was elected.

We have some serious concerns about organized crime involvement, credit and debit card fraud and identity theft. That is really a big concern. I guess the isolated cases can be dealt with, but when they are part of organized crime, particularly when there is an international flavour and international connections to them, we have cause for serious concern.

Criminals who are involved with this type of activity are often the same people involved in the drug activity. They are all tied together at a certain point. I mentioned that the member for Windsor—Tecumseh had noted that lawyers were faced with real estate buyers presenting false identity to get mortgage loans. That is not within the bill, but it is another fertile area for organized crime.

We have mentioned that there is a huge rise in identity theft. The bill has an exemption for law enforcement, such as undercover police to use identity documents, called lawful excuse. This is a very important point. In addition, there is a five-year parliamentary review of the legislation, which we are very happy to see.

In terms of losses, computers get blamed for a lot of things, but a member mentioned yesterday day that online losses were still only 15% of the total, whereas in-person losses were at 25%. People are still experiencing losses with credit card fraud and debit card fraud in person at a higher rate than they are online.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2009 / 4:25 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

Is the House ready for the question?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2009 / 4:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2009 / 4:25 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2009 / 4:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2009 / 4:25 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

Accordingly the bill stands referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

(Motion agreed to, bill read the second time and referred to a committee)