An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act (understanding the official languages)

This bill was last introduced in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session, which ended in March 2011.

This bill was previously introduced in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session and the 40th Parliament, 1st Session.

Sponsor

Yvon Godin  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Nov. 26, 2008
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the Supreme Court Act and introduces a new requirement for judges appointed to the Supreme Court to understand English and French without the assistance of an interpreter.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

March 31, 2010 Passed That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
May 27, 2009 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

The time allocated for debate has expired. Accordingly, the question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Yea.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

All those opposed will please say nay.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Nay.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:50 a.m.


See context

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And more than five members having risen:

Pursuant to Standing Order 98, a recorded division stands deferred until Wednesday, March 31, 2010, immediately before the time provided for private members' business.

Suspension of SittingSupreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 29th, 2010 / 11:55 a.m.


See context

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

We will now suspend until 12:04 p.m. when we will return with government orders.

(The sitting of the House was suspended at 11:55 a.m.)

(The House resumed at 12:04 p.m.)

The House resumed from March 29, consideration of the motion that Bill C-232, An Act to amend the Supreme Court Act (understanding the official languages), be read the third time and passed.

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 31st, 2010 / 5:55 p.m.


See context

The Speaker Peter Milliken

The House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at third reading stage of Bill C-232 under private members' business.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #20

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 31st, 2010 / 6:05 p.m.


See context

The Speaker Peter Milliken

I declare the motion carried.

(Bill read the third time and passed)

Supreme Court ActPrivate Members' Business

March 31st, 2010 / 6:05 p.m.


See context

The Speaker Peter Milliken

It being 6:08 p.m., the House will now proceed to the consideration of private members' business as listed on today's order paper.