An Act to amend the Criminal Code (kidnapping of young person)

This bill was last introduced in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session, which ended in September 2013.

Sponsor

David Wilks  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill.

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to prescribe a minimum punishment of five years when a kidnap victim is under sixteen years of age, unless the person who commits the offence is a parent, guardian or person having the lawful care or charge of the victim.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

Oct. 17, 2012 Passed That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
Oct. 17, 2012 Passed That Bill C-299, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (kidnapping of young person), as amended, be concurred in at report stage.
Oct. 17, 2012 Failed That Bill C-299, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing line 14 on page 1 with the following: “paragraph, other than a parent who has been deprived of all parental rights in respect of the person referred to in that paragraph pursuant to a court order, to a minimum punishment of”
Oct. 17, 2012 Failed That Bill C-299, in Clause 1, be amended by replacing lines 11 to 15 on page 1 with the following: “who commits the offence is (i) a parent, guardian or person having the lawful care or charge of the person referred to in paragraph (1)( a), (b) or (c), or (ii) a person who, in the opinion of the court, occupies a position in relation to the person referred to in paragraph (1)( a), (b) or (c) that is substantially similar to the position occupied by a person referred to in subparagraph (i), to a minimum punishment of imprisonment for a term of five years; and”
Feb. 29, 2012 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

The House resumed from October 5 consideration of Bill C-299, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (kidnapping of young person), as reported (with amendments) from the committee; and of the motions in Group No. 1.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 5:50 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

It being 5:52 p.m., the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at report stage of Bill C-299, under private members' business.

Call in the members.

And the bells having rung:

(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #478

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

I declare Motion No. 1 lost.

The question is now on Motion No. 2.

Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Yea.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

All those opposed will please say nay.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Nay.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:35 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

(The House divided on Motion No. 2, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #479

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

I declare Motion No. 2 lost.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Conservative

David Wilks Conservative Kootenay—Columbia, BC

moved that the bill be concurred in.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Gordon O'Connor Conservative Carleton—Mississippi Mills, ON

Mr. Speaker, if you seek it I believe you will find agreement to apply the results from the previous motion to the current motion with the Conservatives voting yes.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

Is there unanimous consent?

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

NDP

Nycole Turmel NDP Hull—Aylmer, QC

Mr. Speaker, the NDP agrees to apply the vote, and will vote no.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Judy Foote Liberal Random—Burin—St. George's, NL

Mr. Speaker, the Liberals agree to apply the vote and will be voting no.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Bloc

Louis Plamondon Bloc Bas-Richelieu—Nicolet—Bécancour, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois votes no.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Independent

Bruce Hyer Independent Thunder Bay—Superior North, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am voting no.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, the Green Party is voting no.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Independent

Peter Goldring Independent Edmonton East, AB

I will be voting yes.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #480

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

I declare the motion carried.

When shall the bill be read a third time? By leave, now?

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Conservative

David Wilks Conservative Kootenay—Columbia, BC

moved that the bill be read the third time and passed.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

All those in favour, please say yea.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Yea.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

All those opposed, please say nay.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Nay.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:45 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

In my opinion, the yeas have it.

And five or more members having risen:

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #481

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:55 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

I declare the motion carried.

(Bill read the third time and passed)

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

October 17th, 2012 / 6:55 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker

It being 6:55 p.m., the House will now proceed to the consideration of private member's business as listed on today's order paper.