An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)

This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2013.

Sponsor

Jean-François Fortin  Bloc

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Nov. 26, 2012
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-467 (41st Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-423 (41st Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-336 (40th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-395 (40th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-395 (40th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)
C-336 (40th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-467s:

C-467 (2019) Royal Canadian Mounted Police Day Act
C-467 (2010) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (children born abroad)
C-467 (2009) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (children born abroad)
C-467 (2007) An Act to amend the Excise Tax Act (medical equipment)
C-467 (2004) An Act to amend the Radiocommunication Act

Employment Insurance ActRoutine Proceedings

November 26th, 2012 / 3:05 p.m.

Bloc

Jean-François Fortin Bloc Haute-Gaspésie—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-467, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act (labour dispute).

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure today to introduce a bill that addresses an important shortcoming in the Employment Insurance Act. If a business closes following a labour dispute, workers who are laid off and thrown out into the street need to be able to count on employment insurance benefits.

This is 2012. Employees are still being denied employment insurance benefits when a company closes its doors following a prolonged lockout. That is unacceptable.

This problem has to be fixed. That is why I am introducing a bill today to fix it. Workers should not be punished because the method for determining employment insurance eligibility is not suited to their specific circumstances: job loss following a prolonged labour dispute.

The solution is simple: extend the qualifying period for employment insurance eligibility by adding the duration of the labour dispute. That would ensure that Quebeckers who are suffering because of this unfair situation receive the support they need.

This is the second time the Bloc Québécois has introduced this bill. Bill C-395, introduced on May 26, 2009, died on the order paper at third reading.

I hope that all members will realize that they have to support this Bloc Québécois bill in order to help these men and women who were abandoned by the federal government.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)