Question.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse Act
An Act to amend the Criminal Code
This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2013.
This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2013.
Rob Nicholson Conservative
This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.
This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide, in response to the Supreme Court’s decision in R. v. Tse, safeguards related to the authority to intercept private communications without prior judicial authorization under section 184.4 of that Act. Notably, the enactment
(a) requires the Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness and the Attorney General of each province to report on the interceptions of private communications made under section 184.4;
(b) provides that a person who has been the object of such an interception must be notified of the interception within a specified period;
(c) narrows the class of individuals who can make such an interception; and
(d) limits those interceptions to offences listed in section 183 of the Criminal Code.
All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.
Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-55s:
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Question.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin
The question is on the Motion No. 1. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Yea.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Nay.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin
In my opinion the nays have it. I declare Motion No. 1 defeated. Therefore, I also declare Motions Nos. 3 and 5 defeated.
(Motions Nos. 1, 3 and 5 negatived)
The next question is on Motion No. 4. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Yea.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Some hon. members
Nay.
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin
In my opinion the nays have it. I declare Motion No. 4 defeated. Therefore, I also declare Motion No. 6 defeated.
(Motion Nos. 4 and 6 negatived)
Response to the Supreme Court of Canada Decision in R. v. Tse ActRoutine Proceedings
Conservative
