Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians Act

An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services

This bill was last introduced in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session, which ended in September 2013.

Sponsor

Lisa Raitt  Conservative

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment provides for the resumption and continuation of postal services and imposes a final offer selection process to resolve matters remaining in dispute between the parties.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

June 23, 2011 Passed That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
June 23, 2011 Passed That Bill C-6, An Act to provide for the resumption and continuation of postal services, be concurred in at report stage.
June 23, 2011 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole.
June 23, 2011 Passed That this question be now put.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Chair, the Green Party will be voting yes.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

NDP

The Chair NDP Denise Savoie

The amendment is defeated.

(Amendment negatived)

Shall clause 8 carry?

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Gordon O'Connor Conservative Carleton—Mississippi Mills, ON

Madam Chair, if you seek it I believe you would find agreement to apply the results of the previous recorded vote to this motion, with the Conservatives voting yes.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

NDP

The Chair NDP Denise Savoie

Is there agreement to proceed in this way?

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

NDP

Chris Charlton NDP Hamilton Mountain, ON

Madam Chair, NDP members are voting no.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Rodger Cuzner Liberal Cape Breton—Canso, NS

Madam Chair, Liberal members are voting no.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

Bloc

André Bellavance Bloc Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Madam Chair, the Bloc Québécois votes no.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Chair, the Green Party votes no.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

NDP

The Chair NDP Denise Savoie

Clause 8 is adopted.

(Clause 8 agreed to)

[See list under Division No. 27]

(Yeas, 158; Nays, 112)

(On clause 9)

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:15 p.m.


See context

NDP

The Chair NDP Denise Savoie

I will read the amendment proposed by the member for Windsor—Tecumseh:

That Bill C-6 in clause 9 be amended by replacing lines 23 and 24 on page 3 with the following:

“and duties of an arbitrator under sections 60 and 61 of”.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:20 p.m.


See context

NDP

Joe Comartin NDP Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Madam Chair, just briefly, sections 60 and 61 of the Canada Labour Code provide authority to the duties and powers of the arbitrator. The attempt by the government, as drafted now in clause 9, is to limit the discretion and authority of the arbitrator.

I'll just mention one item. More specifically, because of the way clause 9 is drafted now, it does not allow the arbitrator in any way to conduct mediation. Anybody who has been involved in labour relations for 50 years knows the value of that tool to arbitrators. It oftentimes speeds up the process, makes it less costly, and most often achieves the result that we always want in labour management relations, which is that the parties reach a settlement themselves as opposed to, as in this case, having it thrust upon them because of the way it is drafted.

The only other point I would make is that it also allows the arbitrator to look at various methodologies in terms of when he or she is conducting the arbitration process. This provision as it is now, and the rest of clauses 8, 9, 10 and 11, will restrict the arbitrator to only using the final offer selection process, again severely limiting the arbitrator's ability to do the job properly.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:20 p.m.


See context

Halton Ontario

Conservative

Lisa Raitt ConservativeMinister of Labour

Madam Speaker, this clause is there to ensure that certain powers in the code that would be contrary to the intent of this legislation are removed from the arbitrator's abilities.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:20 p.m.


See context

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Chair, I would urge members of this committee to think about even one small change in the way Bill C-6 is now drafted. This is reasonable. It is the Canada Labour Code, and greater flexibility in the hands of the arbitrator makes so much sense. I would hope that committee members might rethink this and that we would not just vote as a bloc again.

Restoring Mail Delivery for Canadians ActGovernment Orders

June 25th, 2011 / 6:20 p.m.


See context

NDP

The Chair NDP Denise Savoie

Shall we apply the results of the previous amendment to this amendment?