I declare Motion No. 1 defeated. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 2, 4 and 7 to 9 defeated.
The next question is on Motion No. 5. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in August 2015.
Peter MacKay Conservative
This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.
This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.
This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide, most notably, for
(a) a new offence of non-consensual distribution of intimate images as well as complementary amendments to authorize the removal of such images from the Internet and the recovery of expenses incurred to obtain the removal of such images, the forfeiture of property used in the commission of the offence, a recognizance order to be issued to prevent the distribution of such images and the restriction of the use of a computer or the Internet by a convicted offender;
(b) the power to make preservation demands and orders to compel the preservation of electronic evidence;
(c) new production orders to compel the production of data relating to the transmission of communications and the location of transactions, individuals or things;
(d) a warrant that will extend the current investigative power for data associated with telephones to transmission data relating to all means of telecommunications;
(e) warrants that will enable the tracking of transactions, individuals and things and that are subject to legal thresholds appropriate to the interests at stake; and
(f) a streamlined process of obtaining warrants and orders related to an authorization to intercept private communications by ensuring that those warrants and orders can be issued by a judge who issues the authorization and by specifying that all documents relating to a request for a related warrant or order are automatically subject to the same rules respecting confidentiality as the request for authorization.
The enactment amends the Canada Evidence Act to ensure that the spouse is a competent and compellable witness for the prosecution with respect to the new offence of non-consensual distribution of intimate images.
It also amends the Competition Act to make applicable, for the purpose of enforcing certain provisions of that Act, the new provisions being added to the Criminal Code respecting demands and orders for the preservation of computer data and orders for the production of documents relating to the transmission of communications or financial data. It also modernizes the provisions of the Act relating to electronic evidence and provides for more effective enforcement in a technologically advanced environment.
Lastly, it amends the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act to make some of the new investigative powers being added to the Criminal Code available to Canadian authorities executing incoming requests for assistance and to allow the Commissioner of Competition to execute search warrants under the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act.
All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.
Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-13s:
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin
I declare Motion No. 1 defeated. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 2, 4 and 7 to 9 defeated.
The next question is on Motion No. 5. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Nay.
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin
In my opinion the nays have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Central Nova Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay ConservativeMinister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin
The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders
Some hon. members
Yea.
Protecting Canadians from Online Crime ActGovernment Orders