Red Tape Reduction Act

An Act to control the administrative burden that regulations impose on businesses

This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in August 2015.

Sponsor

Tony Clement  Conservative

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment enacts the Red Tape Reduction Act, which establishes controls on the amount of administrative burden that regulations impose on businesses.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-21s:

C-21 (2022) Law An Act to amend certain Acts and to make certain consequential amendments (firearms)
C-21 (2021) An Act to amend certain Acts and to make certain consequential amendments (firearms)
C-21 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Customs Act
C-21 (2011) Political Loans Accountability Act
C-21 (2010) Law Standing up for Victims of White Collar Crime Act
C-21 (2009) Law Appropriation Act No. 5, 2008-2009

Votes

Nov. 17, 2014 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Government Operations and Estimates.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Mr. Speaker, that is an excellent example of the sort of monkey funhouse mirror that we see with the Conservatives. From a distance, they say they are going to clear red tape and make government simpler, yet when people try to use government programs, they find that working their way through them is exceedingly complicated and arcane. The Building Canada fund is an excellent example. I remember working for the Algonquin Nation before I was elected, dealing with small hiring projects for young people, and the burden of following through every single week was actually not worth the value of the grant for hiring people, because we had to do so much reporting. Although these were fairly simple projects, this is a government obsession. The Conservatives are not making things simpler; they are actually making things harder.

We can ask any veteran how easy it was to access services when they were being turned away, or we can ask how easy it is for people to get a disability tax credit or benefit. It is a straightforward thing, and they are being turned away.

The Conservatives are very interested in what they believe is reducing red tape, so if it is Suncor, the Conservatives will strip all the rules that they need to get it through. However, if a veteran needs access or a single mother is looking to get basic support for her child, they will jump through hoop after hoop. When a municipality is filling out these forms, we hear about it all the time. That is the meaningless red tape that we should be targeting.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

Is the House ready for the question?

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

The question is on the motion.

Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

On division.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

I declare the motion carried on division.

(Motion agreed to, bill read the third time and passed)

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

The government House leader is rising on a point.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Peter Van Loan Conservative York—Simcoe, ON

Mr. Speaker, I do not think that it is the case that you can simply declare it on division if it is not the view of the House that it was on division and the House is not consenting to it.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

To the government House leader, although it sounds almost as though this is an appeal of my ruling, I heard “on division”. No one stood up. There was only one person who stood up on this side that I saw, so my determination is that it passed on division.

That is my determination. Does the government House leader wish to rise on another point? If not, the member for Burlington is rising on a point.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:35 p.m.

Conservative

Mike Wallace Conservative Burlington, ON

Mr. Speaker, I think you will find, if you ask for it, unanimous consent to see the clock at 5:52 p.m. to allow for the bells to ring for us to begin the vote tonight.

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:40 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

Does the member have unanimous consent to see the clock at 5:52 p.m.?

Red Tape Reduction ActGovernment Orders

February 3rd, 2015 / 5:40 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.