An Act respecting further COVID-19 measures

This bill is from the 43rd Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2020.

Sponsor

Bill Morneau  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

Part 1 amends the Income Tax Act to revise the eligibility criteria for the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) in order to support those employers hardest hit by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It also extends the CEWS to November 21, 2020, with the ability to extend the CEWS by regulation to no later than December 31, 2020, and provides a revised calculation of the CEWS for the fifth and subsequent qualifying periods. Finally, it makes amendments to the Income Tax Act and the Income Tax Regulations to ensure that the CEWS operates effectively.
Part 2 amends the Pension Act, the Department of Veterans Affairs Act, the Children’s Special Allowances Act and the Veterans Well-being Act to authorize the disclosure of information for the purpose of the administration of a program to provide a one-time payment to persons with disabilities for reasons related to COVID-19. It also amends the Income Tax Act to authorize the use by officials, or disclosure to Government of Canada officials, of taxpayer information solely for the purpose of that one-time payment. Finally, it provides that any amount payable in relation to the administration of the program to provide that one-time payment is to be paid out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund.
Part 3 enacts the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19) which addresses the need for flexibility in relation to certain time limits and other periods that are established by or under Acts of Parliament and that are difficult or impossible to meet as a result of the exceptional circumstances produced by COVID-19. In particular, the enactment
(a) suspends, for a maximum of six months, certain time limits in relation to proceedings before courts;
(b) temporarily enables ministers to suspend or extend time limits and to extend other periods in relation to specified Acts and regulations for a maximum of six months; and
(c) provides for the transparent exercise of the powers it confers and for Parliamentary oversight over the exercise of those powers.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-20s:

C-20 (2026) Build Canada Homes Act
C-20 (2022) Law Public Complaints and Review Commission Act
C-20 (2021) An Act to amend the Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador Additional Fiscal Equalization Offset Payments Act
C-20 (2016) Law Appropriation Act No. 3, 2016-17

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-20 extends the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy, broadens eligibility, provides payments to Canadians with disabilities, and adjusts legal time limits, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Liberal

  • Enhances wage subsidy program: Bill C-20 extends the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy to December 2020, broadens eligibility, and introduces a two-tiered system with a base and top-up subsidy to protect more jobs and support recovery.
  • Provides disability financial support: The bill enables a one-time, non-taxable $600 payment for 1.7 million eligible Canadians with disabilities, helping cover increased pandemic-related costs for essential services and support.
  • Adjusts legal and regulatory deadlines: Bill C-20 temporarily suspends or extends statutory and legislative time limits in federal acts and regulations for up to six months, ensuring fairness during pandemic-related disruptions.

Conservative

  • Wage subsidy changes are overly complex: The party criticizes the proposed wage subsidy changes for their excessive complexity, which will create confusion, increase administrative burden, and necessitate expensive external expertise for businesses.
  • Proposes back-to-work bonus for CERB: The party advocates for a "back-to-work bonus" to replace the current CERB cliff, allowing workers to gradually phase out benefits by losing only 50 cents for every dollar earned over $1,000.
  • Criticizes government over ethical scandals: The party criticizes the government's ethical conduct, particularly the WE Charity scandal, accusing it of a lack of transparency, obstructing accountability, and using the bill as a distraction.
  • Identifies gaps in support and economic strategy: The party highlights missed opportunities in the bill to support key sectors like agriculture, oil and gas, and seasonal tourism, and criticizes the government's overall economic strategy as unsustainable.

NDP

  • Critiques government's minimal action: The NDP criticizes the Liberal government for consistently doing the "minimum possible," offering "empty words" instead of concrete action, and being slow to help vulnerable Canadians while quickly assisting friends or corporations.
  • Demands universal and inclusive support: The party advocates for comprehensive support, including extending and increasing CERB, ensuring all Canadians with disabilities receive help, improving EI, and providing federal funding for affordable child care and education.
  • Addresses systemic racism and gender inequality: The NDP highlights the disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on women, demanding child care and addressing gender inequalities. They also call for concrete action against systemic racism in policing and other institutions.
  • Criticizes bill C-20 and current policies: While acknowledging minor improvements, the NDP criticizes Bill C-20 for its restrictive definitions and for leaving too many vulnerable people behind, especially those with disabilities, and for the inadequate national leadership on long-term care.

Bloc

  • Supports bill for Quebecers: The Bloc supports the bill as it benefits Quebec, particularly through improved aid for persons with disabilities and a scalable wage subsidy accessible to seasonal businesses.
  • Adjustments needed for CERB: The party criticizes the CERB for disincentivizing work and for not addressing fraud. They advocate for its adjustment, scalability, or integration into the EI program.
  • Condemns undemocratic process: The Bloc condemns the government's "sham procedure" for passing the bill, arguing it bypasses proper parliamentary study and consultation, leading to potential flaws.
  • Calls for ethical reforms: The party believes political parties should not receive the wage subsidy and highlights missed opportunities to extend EI sickness benefits, support "guardian angels," and address tax havens.

Green

  • Supports wage subsidies but raises concerns: The Green Party applauds government wage support for Canadians but questions the system's complexity, fearing retroactive penalties for businesses acting in good faith.
  • Calls for better disability support: The party welcomes the one-time payment for persons with disabilities, but criticizes the five-month delay and the amount as insufficient, urging more robust support for vulnerable Canadians.
  • Advocates for parliamentary collaboration: The party regrets partisan politics, calling for increased collaboration, respect, and human decency among members to ensure constituents' needs are met, especially during the pandemic.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:45 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Madam Speaker, I would like to start by congratulating my colleague from Fredericton for her fine speech, which was full of wisdom and empathy. It is immensely appreciated.

I would have appreciated my colleague's speech even more without the background noise, which is getting extremely loud these days. The House is sitting, and it would be nice if the people in the rooms around this one would realize it and be a little quieter.

That being said, to get back to my colleague's speech, I heard her mention seniors. First, I want to thank her for her concern about our families and loved ones. The crisis has affected us, but we are doing well. I think we are resilient and united.

We were talking about seniors and people with disabilities. I would like to hear my colleague's opinion about the idea that, rather than responding to the repeated demands of people with disabilities and the incessant demands of our seniors, we should improve their living conditions permanently. These are demands that have been put forward by the Bloc Québécois, but also by other opposition parties.

Why is the government stubbornly insisting on making one-time payments? A payment of $300 for seniors and $600 for people with disabilities seems pretty paltry.

What is my Green Party colleague's opinion on the matter?

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Green

Jenica Atwin Green Fredericton, NB

Madam Speaker, I just think it shows so much about our society today, about how we prioritize, how we have completely lost the idea of eldership and how important seniors are in our communities. We are all going to be there, and we should definitely be trying to improve our quality of life at all stages, but particularly as we face our senior years.

To me, we need to do far more to protect those in our communities who are most vulnerable and who have years and years of experience being Canadian, who have gone through so many things, other difficult times and experiences similar to this. There is so much to learn from them. To support them with a one-time $300 payment is symbolic of how much we value them, and we should do so much more.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Conservative

Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton—Melville, SK

Madam Speaker, the member mentioned the importance of proper debate. Would she like to comment on the fact that we have not been allowed to debate the way the House should be allowed to do? Our rights and privileges, as the opposition, in holding the government to account have been shut down by the Prime Minister and the Liberal caucus, with the support of the NDP, which means that we are not able to do our job in the way the member is suggesting it should be done.

Also, given that she is here today, as we all are, have been and will be for three days in a row, could she comment on why we cannot reconvene the House to do the job it was meant to do, namely, to sit in this place safely and do our job as the official opposition and hold the government to account and improve bills, as we have done today in giving the disability benefit to more people, including veterans?

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Green

Jenica Atwin Green Fredericton, NB

Madam Speaker, to be honest, I have to disagree with the first part of my hon. colleague's question. I feel, especially as a Green Party member, that I have actually been given more opportunities to participate in debate. I particularly enjoy the virtual participation when we have the five-minute question slots, with the back-and-forth that occurs. We are getting our questions to Canadians. We are getting messages from the ministers responsible.

We are having adequate conversations and discussion, but I would love to see virtual voting, because that is the missing piece here. We can do the work we need to do in the House. We need to adapt to the changes that have been thrown our way during this pandemic, and the way to do that is through virtual voting.

I cannot see this room—

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

An hon. member

If you do not want to come to work, resign.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Green

Jenica Atwin Green Fredericton, NB

I am at work right now, thanks very much. I am still speaking, so if you could respect the decorum—

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

Order, please. Can we allow members to express their opinions civilly?

The member may conclude.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Green

Jenica Atwin Green Fredericton, NB

Madam Speaker, we cannot fill this room with 338 MPs. It is already quite filled at the moment. Each of us has our own lives, families and communities to return to, and it would be very irresponsible of us to have everyone return. Without virtual voting, without giving members the equal opportunity to represent their constituencies, this is the way it has to be, and I am very supportive of that.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Bloc

Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC

Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for her speech, which was very touching. It was a nice call for collaboration.

I, too, believe that we could modernize our way of doing things. We did it once with this hybrid Parliament and we could move toward virtual voting. I think that could help us do our jobs in our respective ridings. It would also help young mothers who want to go into politics while still being able to spend time at home with their children.

I would like to hear what my colleague has to say about that since I know that she has young children.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

Unfortunately, we do not have time to hear the answer to that question. I need to give what little time we have remaining before statements by members to the hon. member for Steveston—Richmond East.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:50 p.m.

Conservative

Kenny Chiu Conservative Steveston—Richmond East, BC

Madam Speaker, I believe in helping Canadians, and I also believe this should not be a controversial statement. After all, all of us gathered here today have come together as elected members of Parliament to represent the larger body of Canadians and act in their best interests.

How did the government best help Canadians in this unprecedented time? Let us review.

At first the government believed that this goal would be best accomplished through a massive power grab. The Liberals shamefully tried to use a public health crisis to give themselves the power to raise taxes, debt and spending, without parliamentary approval, until January 1, 2022. When this failed, they reverted to the more tried and true strategy of reckless spending and handouts, telling bureaucrats to bypass necessary checks and balances. Many of the programs developed for aid were ill-conceived and poorly implemented. Parliament needed to be recalled multiple times to correct programs, as outlined by my esteemed colleague from Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River. All the while, they were racking up a deficit of $343 billion, which will push our national debt over $1 trillion. We are the only G7 country that will receive a credit rating drop.

Of course, this has also culminated in scandals. As we are all aware, the Ethics Commissioner is investigating the $912-million contract to WE Charity, an organization with close ties to the Prime Minister's family. The Prime Minister is the only Canadian prime minister formally found to have broken ethics laws, and the only one who has achieved it multiple times. It has resulted in the steady erosion of the trust Canadians place in their governing body and in their politicians. It makes Canadians question the integrity of government leadership. They do not believe the programs in bills like Bill C-20 will help them in times of need, as they are just another way to line the pockets of certain friends.

The Prime Minister promised sunny ways. He said sunlight was the best disinfectant. Now we are in the middle of summer and there is plenty of sunlight to disinfect any dirty laundry. All he has to do now is agree to subject himself to such exposure by appearing before committees and co-operating honestly with the Ethics Commissioner to the fullest, or else he has failed to live up to his word, once again becoming another example of why Canadians doubt measures in Bill C-20.

I remind my esteemed Liberal colleagues of their duty to hold higher standards. If they stand behind such incompetence and corruption, are they not complicit in the degradation of Canadian governments and the betrayal of public trust? Surely they too must feel some tinge of betrayal from the actions of their leader. The trust they have placed in him to make Canada a better place for their constituencies is eroded, and they are no longer able to hold their heads high and take pride in what they represent, because many find what they represent to be mere sponsorship-scandal-type underhanded politics, a lust for power and a greed to line the pockets of friends.

What I would like to see is a change of mindset in our government and the restoration of the honour of the governing party. We must work together toward economic recovery. As the Prime Minister has stated, “Conservatives are not our enemies; they're our neighbours.” The government ought to do the neighbourly thing and listen when the Conservatives give voice in Parliament to the outcry of citizens impacted by the economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.

While we encourage non-partisan efforts to help Canadians and wait for the government to accept them, the Conservatives will continue to press the government to implement the back-to-work bonus and plan to make the Canada emergency response benefit more flexible and generous so that workers can earn higher wages as businesses gradually open. This will truly improve the situations of Canadians in need and help place our economy on the path of recovery.

Further COVID-19 Measures ActGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 1:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

I thank the hon. member for his efforts to respect the time.

The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C-20, An Act respecting further COVID-19 measures, be read the second time and referred to a committee.

An Act Respecting Further COVID-19 MeasuresGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 3:05 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

It being 3:06 p.m., pursuant to order made on Monday, July 20, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the second reading stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

An Act Respecting Further COVID-19 MeasuresGovernment Orders

July 21st, 2020 / 3:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.