An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada's call to action number 94)

This bill is from the 43rd Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2020.

Sponsor

Marco Mendicino  Liberal

Status

Second reading (House), as of Feb. 24, 2020
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends the Citizenship Act to include, in the Oath or Affirmation of Citizenship, a solemn promise to respect the Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit and Métis peoples, in order to respond to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s call to action number 94.

Similar bills

C-8 (43rd Parliament, 2nd session) Law An Act to amend the Citizenship Act (Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada's call to action number 94)
C-99 (42nd Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Citizenship Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-6s:

C-6 (2025) Law Appropriation Act No. 1, 2025-26
C-6 (2021) Law Appropriation Act No. 4, 2021-22
C-6 (2020) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (conversion therapy)
C-6 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-6 seeks to amend the Citizenship Act by updating the oath of citizenship to include recognition and affirmation of Aboriginal and treaty rights of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples.

Liberal

  • Fulfills TRC call to action: The bill implements Truth and Reconciliation Commission's call to action 94, amending the citizenship oath to include Indigenous peoples, which is a vital step toward reconciliation and renewing relationships based on rights and respect.
  • Educates new citizens: The amendment ensures new Canadians understand indigenous peoples' history and their constitutional rights, making this shared history part of their commitment as citizens.
  • Inclusive oath wording: The wording for the new oath was developed through extensive consultations with national indigenous organizations to be precise, inclusive of First Nations, Inuit, and Métis experiences, and respectful of diverse identities.

Conservative

  • Opposes bill C-6: The Conservative Party opposes Bill C-6, viewing its proposed changes to the citizenship oath as redundant "virtue signalling" that diverts attention from genuine reconciliation efforts.
  • Demands substantive reconciliation action: Conservatives demand substantive action on reconciliation, including clean water, safe housing, education, and economic opportunities, rather than symbolic gestures like amending the oath.
  • Supports indigenous economic development: The party supports Indigenous communities' right to economic development through natural resource projects, criticizing the government for hindering projects with Indigenous support.
  • Calls for better citizenship education: Conservatives advocate for implementing TRC recommendation 93 to revise the citizenship guide, providing comprehensive education on Indigenous history and treaties to new Canadians.

NDP

  • Supports bill C-6: The NDP supports Bill C-6, which amends the citizenship oath to include recognition of Aboriginal and treaty rights, aligning with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Call to Action 94.
  • Criticizes slow reconciliation progress: The NDP criticizes the Liberal government for the five-year delay in enacting this "simple but important change" and its overall slow pace in implementing TRC Calls to Action.
  • Highlights ongoing discrimination: The party highlights the government's continued discrimination against Indigenous peoples through underfunding, lack of clean water, and legal battles against Indigenous children.
  • Demands true nation-to-nation relationship: The NDP demands a truly reimagined nation-to-nation relationship, urging the government to implement UNDRIP, honor Indigenous rights, and engage meaningfully with Indigenous peoples, including the Wet'suwet'en.

Bloc

  • Supports the bill's principle: The Bloc Québécois supports Bill C-6, recognizing the legitimacy and importance of incorporating a reference to Indigenous rights into the citizenship oath as a step towards reconciliation.
  • Critiques Canada's nation recognition: The party argues that Canada's current federalism offers an awkward, piecemeal approach to nation recognition, failing to define itself as a free association of equal nations.
  • Questions oath's specific wording: The Bloc notes that the bill's proposed oath wording differs from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's recommendation and questions why the government chose this specific phrasing.

Green

  • Supports bill C-6: The Green Party supports Bill C-6 as it fulfills the 94th call to action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, updating the citizenship oath.
  • Criticizes slow reconciliation progress: The party criticizes the government's extremely slow progress on the 94 TRC calls to action, estimating full implementation will take until 2057.
  • Questions bill's impact and timing: While supporting the bill, the party questions its timing and actual impact on reconciliation, given the government's broader failures in Indigenous relations.
  • Bill helps immigrants, not Indigenous peoples: The party acknowledges the bill's positive impact on the immigration experience but states it falls short as a meaningful step for Indigenous peoples' reconciliation.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Citizenship ActGovernment Orders

February 24th, 2020 / 6:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Citizenship ActGovernment Orders

February 24th, 2020 / 6:20 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

Order. The hon. member's time is very important and very short-lived, so I would just ask members to hold their comments and questions.

The hon. member for Chilliwack—Hope.

Citizenship ActGovernment Orders

February 24th, 2020 / 6:20 p.m.

Conservative

Mark Strahl Conservative Chilliwack—Hope, BC

Madam Speaker, I will take no lessons on how I should speak in the House of Commons from a member who is actively campaigning against jobs and prosperity for first nations communities in Alberta and British Columbia.

Citizenship ActGovernment Orders

February 24th, 2020 / 6:20 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

Before I go to the next speaker, I want to advise him that I will have to, unfortunately, cut off the debate at one point soon to go to the rest of the orders of the day.

Resuming debate, the Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons.

Citizenship ActGovernment Orders

February 24th, 2020 / 6:25 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, it is always a pleasure to rise and address the chamber.

I am disappointed in the Conservative Party. Those members have been consistent in terms of not really being genuine with respect to supporting the important issue of reconciliation. It has been interesting throughout the day to listen to members stand up and in essence belittle the legislation or outright oppose it, not really recognizing just how important this is.

I have heard members say it is just one bill, that it just deals with the citizenship oath. The citizenship oath is very important. Every year, more than 100,000 individuals will take the oath of citizenship. I suspect no one would try to underplay the importance of the swearing in of a new citizen.

The debate that we have been hearing today has been about reconciliation. The opposition, particularly Conservative members, have been giving the false impression that Bill C-6 is all we are doing for reconciliation. Absolutely nothing could be further from the truth.

Virtually from day one back in 2015, when our government replaced the Harper regime, Canadians finally had a government that was committed to reconciliation. For many years, indigenous communities in all regions of this country had been calling on the government to do something on reconciliation, and the Conservatives stood by and did virtually nothing.

I remember sitting on the opposition benches and calling for a public inquiry in regard to the murdered and missing indigenous women and girls, well over 1,400 of them, and the Conservatives did absolutely nothing. I had the opportunity to ask that question myself. One of the first things our government did was to establish a public inquiry into that.

It is not just the calls for action. It is things such as our investment of hundreds of millions of dollars into indigenous-related issues, whether it was clean water, whether it was the environment, or whether it was education. The Minister of Indigenous Services and the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations would tell us a long list of actions that have been taken. Bill C-6 today is just one aspect of an ongoing way to deal with reconciliation. The Conservatives say we are taking low-hanging fruit from the trees, or whatever they are implying. Again, nothing could be further from the truth.

I spoke inside this chamber not that long ago in regard to other calls for action, such as the preservation of heritage language, such as child and family services, such as foster kids. In my province alone, well over 10,000 children are in foster care. One of the calls for action dealt with that particular issue. We brought in substantial legislation last year to help in ensuring that we are able to assist in foster care and able to provide the necessary care by enabling indigenous communities and leaders to take back more responsibility with regard to their children. That is fairly substantial.

We have taken action on eight or nine calls for action. Many of these recommendations are not even completely under federal jurisdiction.

I will continue my comments at a later point, as it appears my time is running out.

Citizenship ActGovernment Orders

February 24th, 2020 / 6:25 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

The hon. member will have 15 minutes and 30 seconds left in his time when this matter next comes before the House.