Protecting Victims Act

An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures)

Sponsor

Sean Fraser  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends various Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters.
It amends the Criminal Code to, among other things,
(a) create a new offence that prohibits engaging in a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct towards an intimate partner;
(b) provide that, in the following circumstances, murder — known as femicide when committed against a female person — is murder in the first degree:
(i) the murder is committed against an intimate partner in the context of a pattern of coercive or controlling conduct,
(ii) the murder is committed in the context of sexual violence,
(iii) the murder is committed in the context of human trafficking, or
(iv) the murder is motivated by hate;
(c) provide that, if an offender commits manslaughter in those circumstances, the court must consider whether to impose a sentence of imprisonment for life on the offender and, if that sentence is imposed, an adult offender is ineligible for parole for 10 to 25 years;
(d) remove from the criminal harassment offence the requirement to prove that the victim subjectively feared for their safety and replace it with a requirement to prove that the harassing conduct could reasonably be expected to cause the victim to believe that someone’s safety is threatened;
(e) amend the offence of non-consensual distribution of an intimate image to include, among such images, a visual representation showing an identifiable person depicted as nude, as nearly nude, as exposing their sexual organs or as engaged in explicit sexual activity, if the depiction is likely to be mistaken for a visual recording of that person;
(f) amend certain existing child sexual offences to include prohibiting a person from inviting a child to expose their own sexual organs for a sexual purpose;
(g) criminalize the distribution of visual representations of bestiality;
(h) create a new offence relating to the recruitment of a person under 18 years of age to be a party to an offence;
(i) provide that victims of certain offences, such as offences committed against an intimate partner, are entitled to testimonial aids;
(j) permit courts to order that an offender serve a period of imprisonment below a mandatory minimum term of imprisonment, but only if the mandatory minimum term of imprisonment would amount to cruel and unusual punishment for that particular offender;
(k) create a new Part establishing a framework for applying alternative measures and restorative justice processes in appropriate cases;
(l) create a new Part in respect of unreasonable delay that requires a court to consider specific factors in relation to case complexity, directs a court to exclude time periods in respect of specific applications and requires that a stay of proceedings be ordered only if a court is satisfied, taking into account a list of factors, that no other remedy would be appropriate and just;
(m) streamline and strengthen the procedural rules in sexual offence trials that govern when evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity can be adduced and when certain private records, including therapeutic records, can be produced or adduced; and
(n) allow the possibility of using affidavit evidence for certain cases involving identity theft and identity fraud.
The enactment also makes consequential amendments to other Acts.
The enactment also amends the Youth Criminal Justice Act to, among other things,
(a) ensure that it better reflects the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights with respect to the rights and interests of victims;
(b) modernize the principle requiring consideration of the needs of young persons, including by requiring particular attention to those of Aboriginal and Black young persons; and
(c) allow youth justice courts to order that a young person enter into a recognizance if there is a reasonable fear that the young person will commit a child sexual offence.
The enactment also amends the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights to
(a) modify the preamble to affirm the importance of victim-centred and trauma-informed approaches;
(b) provide victims with the right to be treated with respect, courtesy, compassion and fairness;
(c) enable victims to receive information without being required to make a request;
(d) provide that victims have the right to receive information about their rights under that Act and the protection measures that are available to them;
(e) broaden the information that victims have the right to receive about available restorative justice processes; and
(f) clarify the right of victims to present a victim impact statement at sentencing and a victim statement for consideration when decisions regarding parole or corrections are made about the offender who harmed them.
The enactment also amends the National Defence Act to, among other things,
(a) provide that victims of certain offences, such as offences committed against an intimate partner, are entitled to testimonial aids;
(b) create a new Division in respect of unreasonable delay that requires a court martial to consider specific factors in relation to case complexity, directs a court martial to exclude time periods in respect of specific applications and requires that a stay of proceedings be ordered only if a court martial is satisfied, taking into account a list of factors, that no other remedy would be appropriate and just;
(c) streamline and strengthen the procedural rules to align with the Criminal Code procedural rules in sexual offence trials that govern when evidence of a complainant’s past sexual activity can be adduced and when certain private records, including therapeutic records, can be produced or adduced;
(d) provide victims with the right to be treated with respect, courtesy, compassion and fairness;
(e) provide that victims have the right to receive information about their rights under the Division of the National Defence Act entitled “Declaration of Victims Rights” and information about the protection measures that are available to them; and
(f) enable victims to receive information from authorities in the military justice system without being required to make a request.
The enactment also amends An Act respecting the mandatory reporting of Internet child sexual abuse and exploitation material by persons who provide an Internet service to, among other things,
(a) clarify the types of Internet services covered by that Act;
(b) require that transmission data be provided with the mandatory notification in cases where the material is manifestly child sexual abuse and exploitation material;
(c) extend the period of preservation of data related to an offence; and
(d) extend the limitation period for the prosecution of an offence under that Act.
The enactment also amends the Firearms Act to clarify that an individual whose firearms licence or registration certificate has been revoked is required to deliver their firearm to a peace officer, firearms officer or chief firearms officer and to provide that an individual is not eligible to hold a licence under that Act if the chief firearms officer has reasonable grounds to suspect that the individual may have engaged in an act of domestic violence or stalking.
The enactment also amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to, among other things, enhance the disclosure of information to victims and other components of the criminal justice system and provide for the submission of victim statements in certain instances.
Finally, the enactment also amends the Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters Act to facilitate legal assistance between Canada and supranational bodies with responsibility for criminal investigations or prosecutions.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-16s:

C-16 (2022) Law Appropriation Act No. 1, 2022-23
C-16 (2020) Law Appropriation Act No. 4, 2020-21
C-16 (2020) Law An Act to amend the Canadian Dairy Commission Act
C-16 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code

Votes

June 11, 2026 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-16, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures)
June 8, 2026 Passed Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-16, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures)
June 8, 2026 Failed C-16, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures) (report stage amendment) (Motion No. 2)
June 8, 2026 Failed C-16, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures) (report stage amendment) (Motion No. 1)
June 4, 2026 Passed Time allocation for Bill C-16, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures)

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-16, the Protecting Victims Act, proposes updates to the Criminal Code regarding gender-based violence, femicide, child protection, court delays, and digital safety, while introducing judicial discretion regarding mandatory minimum penalties, a provision that has sparked significant debate between parties.

Liberal

  • Addressing gender-based violence: Liberals prioritize criminalizing coercive control to enable early intervention and ensure murders involving intimate partner violence, sexual offenses, or gender-based hatred are automatically treated as first-degree murder under the specific term "femicide."
  • Protecting children online: The party seeks to modernize child protection laws by expanding luring and sextortion offenses, capturing AI-generated deepfakes, and restoring constitutionally compliant mandatory minimum penalties for grave crimes like child sexual exploitation.
  • Strengthening victims' rights: The bill updates the Victims Bill of Rights to ensure proactive information sharing, improved access to testimonial aids, and greater survivor participation throughout the criminal process to restore faith in the justice system.
  • Reducing court delays: Members support measures to address court delays by requiring judges to consider remedies other than stays of proceedings and providing clearer guidance on complex cases to prevent serious charges from being dismissed.

Conservative

  • Supports specific victim protections: The Conservatives support provisions strengthening child protections, criminalizing coercive control, and addressing AI-generated deepfakes, noting that many of these measures were originally championed by Conservative members.
  • Opposes the sentencing safety valve: The party strongly opposes Clause 63, labeling it a "poison pill" that undermines the justice system by allowing judges to bypass mandatory minimum penalties for serious crimes like human trafficking and weapons offences.
  • Criticizes lack of guardrails: Members express frustration that the government rejected amendments intended to exclude heinous acts, such as aggravated sexual assault and extortion with firearms, from the bill’s sentencing safety valve.
  • Advocates for the notwithstanding clause: The party calls for the use of the notwithstanding clause to protect mandatory minimum sentences from judicial activism, particularly concerning child exploitation material, rather than allowing judges to circumvent Parliament's sentencing laws.

NDP

  • Prioritize violence prevention funding: The NDP criticizes the bill for failing to provide adequate funding and support for prevention programs. They argue that the government focuses too much on reactive, carceral approaches rather than addressing the root causes of violence.
  • Formal recognition of femicide: While supporting the formal acknowledgment of femicide in the Canadian Criminal Code, the party emphasizes that this recognition must be accompanied by proactive solutions that prevent crimes before they occur.
  • Strengthen deepfake regulations: The NDP calls for stronger language to close loopholes that protect big tech companies from accountability for sexualized deepfakes. They argue current provisions fail to sufficiently protect women and gender-diverse people from AI-facilitated abuse.
  • Support for social safety nets: Members advocate for a guaranteed livable basic income as a foundational tool to combat the crisis of violence against women, linking economic security directly to the safety of indigenous women, girls, and gender-diverse people.

Bloc

  • Support for Bill C-16: The party supports the bill, noting that it includes several proposals championed by the Bloc Québécois to improve protections for victims of sexual violence and child abuse.
  • Femicide and coercive control: The Bloc welcomes the recognition of femicide and the criminalization of coercive control, which allows for earlier intervention in abusive situations before physical violence occurs.
  • Protecting minors from recruitment: The party supports creating a specific offence for recruiting minors into organized crime, targeting adults who exploit young people for criminal activities via social media and other means.
  • Judicial discretion and funding: The Bloc advocates for mandatory minimum sentences that permit judicial discretion in exceptional circumstances and calls for increased federal transfers to support Quebec's administration of justice services.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:40 p.m.

Bloc

Sébastien Lemire Bloc Abitibi—Témiscamingue, QC

Madam Speaker, Bill C‑16 makes certain amendments to the Firearms Act.

The bill “amends the Firearms Act to clarify that an individual whose firearms licence or registration certificate has been revoked is required to deliver their firearm”. Furthermore, no individual is eligible to hold a licence if it is suspected that they “may have engaged in an act of domestic violence or stalking.”

We know that the Conservatives are generally opposed to the idea of any form of gun control. Does my colleague think this amendment to the bill is reasonable?

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ellis Ross Conservative Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Madam Speaker, it could have been stronger. There were even amendments talking about crimes committed with firearms. The Liberal government, through committee majority, voted them down as well.

All I am saying is the amendments that were rejected could have made this bill so much stronger, including the amendments that dealt with firearms.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Blaine Calkins Conservative Ponoka—Didsbury, AB

Madam Speaker, I want to wind the clock back to 2022 when, in this place, the Liberal government of the day passed Bill C-5, which actually removed mandatory minimum penalties for a number of serious gun crimes, including extortion with a firearm and robbery with a firearm. There were no mitigating court cases or rulings from the Supreme Court of Canada that actually mandated that Parliament do that. That was an ideologically imposed piece of legislation that removed them.

Now the Liberals want to bring back mandatory minimums, with what they call a relief valve, which makes them voluntary mandatory minimums. I have also heard voluntary mandatory when it comes to their gun buyback program. Is there anything that is anymore oxymoronic from the Liberal government than this?

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Ellis Ross Conservative Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Mr. Speaker, the gun buyback or confiscation plan is actually going after law-abiding citizens who have PALS and get training. For those who have restricted firearms, the bar is even higher. They are not going to get safety valves. They are going to get a mandatory sentencing.

Anything under this is going to get reduced sentences, and that is including firearms offences. The Conservatives have been saying that we have to start tightening the controls and the laws around firearms, especially connected to crimes, but not law-abiding citizens.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:40 p.m.

Conservative

Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton—Melville, SK

Madam Speaker, in speaking with our shadow justice minister, something he brought to my attention was that there are many mandatory minimums that are no longer protected, and we tried to give that protection back through our amendments, that have actually already been tested by the Supreme Court and found to be constitutional.

What does that mean, when they can now simply decide to change the ruling?

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

Conservative

Ellis Ross Conservative Skeena—Bulkley Valley, BC

Madam Speaker, it is a political decision. That is what it is.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

It being 5:45 p.m., pursuant to order made earlier today, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the report stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on Motion No. 1. A vote on this motion also applies to Motion No. 3.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, we request a recorded vote, please.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

The recorded division on Motion No. 1 stands deferred.

The next question is on Motion No. 2.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, I would ask that there be a recorded vote.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

The recorded division on Motion No. 2 stands deferred.

Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the recorded divisions stand deferred until Monday, June 8, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Madam Speaker, I suspect that if you were to canvass House, you would find unanimous consent to call it 6 p.m. at this time, so we could begin Private Members' Business.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

Protecting Victims ActGovernment OrdersGovernment Orders

June 4th, 2026 / 5:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

The House resumed from June 4 consideration of Bill C-16, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to criminal and correctional matters (child protection, gender-based violence, delays and other measures), as reported (with amendments) from the committee, and of the motions in Group No. 1.