An Act to authorize certain payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purpose of improving housing supply

Sponsor

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment authorizes payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund to the provinces and territories for the purpose of improving housing supply.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-26s:

C-26 (2022) An Act respecting cyber security, amending the Telecommunications Act and making consequential amendments to other Acts
C-26 (2021) Law Appropriation Act No. 6, 2020-21
C-26 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Canada Pension Plan, the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board Act and the Income Tax Act
C-26 (2014) Law Tougher Penalties for Child Predators Act

Votes

June 17, 2026 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-26, An Act to authorize certain payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purpose of improving housing supply

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-26 proposes authorizing $1.7 billion in federal transfers to provinces and territories to boost housing supply. Supporters emphasize flexible, direct funding, while critics argue the legislation lacks necessary transparency, accountability mechanisms, and specific affordability requirements to effectively address the housing crisis.

Liberal

  • Supports funding for housing supply: The Liberal Party supports authorizing $1.7 billion in immediate payments to provinces and territories to exclusively fund measures that increase housing supply and make homes more attainable for Canadians.
  • Provincial flexibility and local delivery: The proposed funding provides provinces and territories with the flexibility to take targeted actions, such as reducing development fees, to address specific housing needs within their own communities.
  • Part of a broader strategy: This legislation complements other government initiatives, including cutting red tape, investing in housing-enabling infrastructure like water systems, and providing tax relief such as the 5% GST removal on rental construction.
  • Criticizes opposition for stalling progress: Members condemn the Conservative Party's efforts to delay the bill, arguing that stalling prevents local governments from accessing critical funds needed to address the housing crisis and support the construction industry.

Conservative

  • Lack of accountability and transparency: Conservatives oppose the bill as a blank cheque for the Minister of Finance, arguing it lacks clear conditions, reporting requirements, or definitions for how the $1.7 billion will actually increase housing supply.
  • Demand for results-based funding: The party advocates for tying federal funding to measurable results, such as verified housing starts and completions, and calls for oversight by the Auditor General and the Parliamentary Budget Officer.
  • Proposed permanent tax reductions: Instead of temporary measures, the party proposes permanently removing the GST on new homes under $1.3 million to provide certainty for builders and homeowners while incentivizing construction.
  • Prioritizing supply over bureaucracy: Members critique the government for prioritizing new programs and bureaucracies over actual housing outcomes, asserting that success must be measured by affordability and housing starts rather than spending announcements.

NDP

  • Absence of affordability safeguards: The NDP criticizes the bill for authorizing $1.7 billion in spending without including meaningful safeguards, measurable affordability requirements, or support for non-market, co-operative, and Indigenous housing.
  • Prioritizing markets over people: The party argues the legislation focuses on market indicators like inventory and sales rather than addressing human distress, such as homelessness, renter poverty, and social housing wait-lists.
  • Flawed funding allocation formula: Members oppose the funding distribution, noting it is based on housing market indicators rather than human need, which disproportionately allocates funds to certain provinces while neglecting others.
  • Shift toward non-market housing: The NDP advocates for a shift away from market-reliant policies toward a major expansion of non-market and co-op housing, emphasizing that housing must be treated as a human right.

Bloc

  • Supports direct housing transfers: The Bloc Québécois supports Bill C-26 because it transfers funds directly to provinces, allowing Quebec to manage housing priorities and start projects quickly without federal interference or bureaucratic delays.
  • Respects provincial jurisdiction: Members argue that unconditional transfers eliminate administrative duplication and red tape. They emphasize that housing is a provincial responsibility and Quebec is best positioned to manage its own strategy and levers.
  • Concerns over fair funding: The party highlights historical underfunding, noting that Quebec often receives less than its demographic weight. They stress the importance of ensuring Quebec receives a share proportional to its population.
  • Efficiency and construction timelines: Members warn that federal administrative delays often cause missed construction seasons, especially in northern regions. They believe direct transfers are essential to ensure projects are completed during short summer windows.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:50 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

The hon. member for Vancouver East.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:50 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Mr. Speaker, I was once actually in government at the provincial level, at a time when the federal Liberal government cancelled the national affordable housing program. What did New Democrats do provincially? We continued to deliver housing in spite of that. When I was elected and became a cabinet minister, what did we do? We actually grew the money from the Province of British Columbia alone, with the private sector, with the non-profit sector, with municipalities and with everybody else who would partner with us, except for the federal government, which walked away.

Guess what. We grew that money from 600 units to 1,200 units and then to 2,000 units, with the same amount of money. Yes, we believe in the market, but what we also believe in is making sure that we drive the market to deliver for the people, especially when it gets a benefit from taxpayers. That is unlike the current Liberal government. What did it do? It gave money hand over fist to the development sector, to the market, and thought that somehow, magically, affordable housing would appear on its own. Guess what. It did not.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Muys Conservative Flamborough—Glanbrook—Brant North, ON

Mr. Speaker, my colleague from British Columbia raises a question about what the outcomes are for $1.7 billion in funding that we are supposed to approve in the House, based on a two-paragraph bill.

Did the hon. member find in any place in the bill, or in what she has read about it, any sort of targets in terms of the housing, whether it is deeply affordable housing or otherwise, that would be built with the $1.7 billion?

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Mr. Speaker, that is precisely the point. There would be no accountability measures. There would be nothing to which one can say that using $1.7 billion of taxpayers' money would generate a specific return for the people in Canada. There would be zero accountability measures and zero targets. There is none of that information whatsoever in the bill.

As I was saying earlier, I was trying to get from the government what exactly the allocation would be and what the formula is that the government used to decide how to divide the money between the provinces and territories. The Liberals could not even give me that. It was after much to-do, when they were desperate to try to get a unanimous consent motion through, that they then came forward with that information.

Guess what. A whole bunch of provinces would be getting only $10 million out of this. That would not address the housing crisis, would it? The government just says, “Trust us. We will fix it.” Oh, will it really?

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

There being no further members wishing to speak, pursuant to order made earlier today, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of second reading stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on the motion.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, we would request a recorded vote, please.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Pursuant to Standing Order 45, the division stands deferred until Wednesday, June 17, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The hon. member for Winnipeg North is rising on a point of order.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I suspect that, if you were to check the House, there would be unanimous consent to adjourn at this time.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Is it agreed?

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue FundGovernment Orders

June 16th, 2026 / 10:55 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker John Nater

Accordingly, pursuant to order made on Tuesday, June 9, the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 2 p.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 10:58 p.m.)

The House resumed from June 16 consideration of the motion that Bill C-26, An Act to authorize certain payments to be made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the purpose of improving housing supply, be read the second time and referred to a committee.

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the Purpose of Improving Housing SupplyGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2026 / 3:40 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

The House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at second reading stage of Bill C‑26.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #169

An Act to Authorize Certain Payments to be Made out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund for the Purpose of Improving Housing SupplyGovernment Orders

June 17th, 2026 / 3:50 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

I declare the motion carried.

Pursuant to order made on Tuesday, June 16, the bill is deemed referred to a committee of the whole, deemed considered in committee of the whole, deemed reported without amendment, deemed concurred in at report stage and deemed read a third time and passed.

(Bill read the second time, considered in committee of the whole, reported, concurred in, read the third time and passed)