Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2

A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on November 4, 2025

Sponsor

Status

In committee (House), as of June 10, 2026

Subscribe to a feed (what's a feed?) of speeches and votes in the House related to Bill C-31.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

Part 1 implements certain measures in respect of the Income Tax Act and the Income Tax Regulations by
(a) providing temporary immediate expensing for eligible manufacturing or processing buildings;
(b) delivering automatic federal benefits for lower-income individuals;
(c) expanding the anti-avoidance rule for direct trust to-trust transfers to include indirect transfers of trust property to other trusts;
(d) limiting the deferral of tax on investment income resulting from the use of tiered corporate structures with mismatched year ends;
(e) clarifying the expenses that qualify as Canadian exploration expenses;
(f) implementing the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework;
(g) removing bankrupt corporations, trusts and partnerships from the exception to the debt forgiveness rules;
(h) introducing a supplementary rule to strengthen the tax debt anti-avoidance rule;
(i) expanding the clean hydrogen investment tax credit to include hydrogen produced from methane pyrolysis as an eligible production pathway;
(j) enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of information gathering during tax audits;
(k) providing that no Canada Carbon Rebate payments would be made in respect of tax returns, or adjustment requests, filed after October 30, 2026;
(l) simplifying, streamlining and harmonizing the qualified investment rules; and
(m) making a number of technical amendments, including to correct inconsistencies and to better align the law with its intended policy objectives.
It also amends the Excise Tax Act , in relation to certain measures in respect of the Income Tax Act , and the Income Tax Conventions Implementation Act, 1996 , which suspends the operation of the Canada-Russia Income Tax Agreement. Finally, it amends the Air Travellers Security Charge Act , the Excise Act, 2001 and the Select Luxury Items Tax Act in relation to certain measures in respect of the Income Tax Act .
Part 2 amends the Global Minimum Tax Act to, among other things, implement the UTPR that subjects the Canadian constituent entities of certain MNE groups to top-up tax in respect of the low-taxed profits of constituent entities of those MNE groups not already subject to an IIR or qualified domestic minimum top-up tax, implement certain aspects of the administrative guidance in respect of the GloBE Model Rules approved by the Inclusive Framework and published by the OECD and implement a number of technical amendments to correct mistakes or inconsistencies and to better align that Act with its intended policy objectives. This Part also makes amendments to the Access to Information Act , the Income Tax Conventions Interpretation Act and the Tax Court of Canada Act .
Part 3 amends the Excise Tax Act , the Excise Act , the Excise Act, 2001 and other related texts to implement various measures.
Division 1 of Part 3 implements certain measures in respect of the Excise Tax Act and related texts by
(a) clarifying the tax treatment of federally regulated credit unions for Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) purposes;
(b) extending the application of the special GST/HST rules for certain investment plans to first home savings accounts;
(c) clarifying the application of the imported supply rules to financial institutions in respect of insurance policies or loans relating to persons resident in, or property located in, Canada;
(d) clarifying the GST/HST treatment of certain services supplied by the Canadian Payments Association or any of its members as a consequence of a recent amendment to the Canadian Payments Act ;
(e) ensuring that special GST/HST rules for financial institutions apply correctly to certain small investment plans, master pension entities, insurers that issue only annuities and sureties of performance bonds;
(f) making technical corrections to the input tax credit rules respecting the change in use of property following a sale of a business and to the GST/HST rules for financial institutions relating to mergers of investment plans;
(g) ensuring that the GST/HST applies properly to Lloyd’s Insurance;
(h) clarifying, in respect of financial institutions that do business in an HST province and at least one other province, filing requirements and rules related to the recovery of embedded GST/HST amounts;
(i) providing a six-month period, following the death of an individual who is a GST/HST registrant, during which no return of the individual or their estate is required to be filed;
(j) ensuring that a GST/HST reporting election between a supplier and its agent continues to apply despite the amalgamation, merger or wind-up of either party;
(k) authorizing the Canada Revenue Agency to share information with international tax authorities with which Canada has an information-sharing agreement, in a manner consistent with the Income Tax Act ; and
(l) making a number of technical amendments to correct inconsistencies and to better align the law with its intended policy objectives.
Division 2 of Part 3 implements certain measures in respect of the Excise Act , the Excise Act, 2001 and other related texts by
(a) making technical corrections in respect of the computation of the additional excise duty on cigars and the computation of negative amounts generated by statutory formulas;
(b) clarifying the tax treatment of certain cannabis and vaping products that are unaccounted for or that are taken for use;
(c) implementing a new limit in respect of packaged raw leaf tobacco for importation for personal use and making consequential amendments to ensure the proper enforcement of the new limit;
(d) allowing the Canada Revenue Agency to consider and grant relief to brewers in certain circumstances;
(e) extending the maximum validity period for certain licences from two years to three years; and
(f) authorizing the Canada Revenue Agency to share information with international tax authorities with which Canada has an information-sharing agreement, in a manner consistent with the Income Tax Act .
Part 4 enacts an Act and amends several Acts in order to implement various measures.
Division 1 of Part 4 amends the Trust and Loan Companies Act , the Bank Act and the Insurance Companies Act to prohibit financial institutions from issuing documents in bearer form and provide for the replacement of documents that are currently in bearer form.
Division 2 of Part 4 amends the Trust and Loan Companies Act , the Bank Act and the Insurance Companies Act to provide that no action lies against His Majesty in right of Canada and federal government officials for any acts or omissions made in good faith under those Acts.
Division 3 of Part 4 amends the Bank Act to require an institution to offer or sell deposit products in a non-discriminatory manner in certain circumstances.
Division 4 of Part 4 amends the Financial Administration Act to provide the Governor in Council with authority to make regulations with respect to the conditions under which contracts may be entered into by His Majesty or a Crown corporation. The Division also amends the Department of Public Works and Government Services Act to provide the Governor in Council with authority to make regulations respecting the complaints that may be reviewed by the Procurement Ombudsman and the persons who may file a complaint. The Division also makes a related amendment to the National Capital Act .
Division 5 of Part 4 increases the maximum amounts for accessing the Tax Court of Canada’s informal procedure for appeals under the Income Tax Act and Part IX of the Excise Tax Act .
Division 6 of Part 4 amends Schedule II to the Access to Information Act to prohibit the disclosure of confidential information obtained under the Retail Payment Activities Act or prepared from information obtained under that Act.
Division 7 of Part 4 amends the National Housing Act to increase the total of Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation outstanding guarantees that are in force. The Division also amends the Protection of Residential Mortgage or Hypothecary Insurance Act to increase the limit for loans that are insured under that Act.
Division 8 of Part 4 amends the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act to provide the Superintendent of Bankruptcy with the power to request various orders from the court if an unlicensed person acts or represents itself as a licensed trustee, and if a person solicits from another person insolvency filings under that Act or makes representations that are false or misleading in a material respect in relation to bankruptcy and insolvency. The Division also increases the maximum fines for certain offences under that Act.
Division 9 of Part 4 amends the Canada Labour Code to, among other things, prohibit non-compete clauses and other employment-related restrictions, except in certain circumstances.
Division 10 of Part 4 amends the Canadian Human Rights Act to eliminate the position of Deputy Chief Commissioner of the Canadian Human Rights Commission and to provide that the person holding that office is deemed to have been appointed as Chief Commissioner.
Division 11 of Part 4 amends the International Development Research Centre Act to, among other things, reduce the number of members of the Board of Governors of the International Development Research Centre from 14 to 12.
Division 12 of Part 4 amends the Tobacco and Vaping Products Act to provide that a review of the provisions and operation of that Act must be undertaken within five years after the report on the previous review has been tabled in both Houses of Parliament rather than every two years and to specify the period within which the report on the review must be tabled.
Division 13 of Part 4 amends the Pest Control Products Act to replace the mandatory re-evaluation of registered pest control products with a requirement for the Minister of Health to initiate a re-evaluation if, after carrying out an assessment, that Minister has reasonable grounds to believe that the health or environmental risks of a product have increased significantly.
Division 14 of Part 4 amends the Territorial Lands Act to, among other things,
(a) empower the Governor in Council, if the Governor in Council is of the opinion that it is in the national interest, to make orders
(i) to take certain measures with respect to certain lands in Nunavut, including to cancel licences to prospect, the recording of claims or leases of recorded claims or to provide that claims are not to be recorded, that leases of recorded claims are not to be issued or that licences to prospect or leases of recorded claims are not to be renewed, and
(ii) to provide for prohibitions associated with those measures for the persons that are the subject of the orders, including prohibiting the making of an application for a licence to prospect, to record a claim or to lease a recorded claim;
(b) provide that the Minister of Northern Affairs may determine whether compensation is to be paid to certain mineral rights holders that are the subject of the orders referred to in paragraph (a) and, if so, the amount; and
(c) empower the Governor in Council to make regulations respecting the implementation of the orders referred to in paragraph (a) and the compensation referred to in paragraph (b).
Division 15 of Part 4 amends the Red Tape Reduction Act to, among other things, ensure that the provisions of the Official Languages Act , or the provisions of an instrument made under that Act, cannot be the subject of an exemption under Part 2 of the Red Tape Reduction Act .
Division 16 of Part 4 contains measures relating to procurement, production and investment in respect of national defence and national security.
Subdivision A of Division 16 enacts the Defence Investment Agency Act . That Act establishes the Defence Investment Agency, whose mandate is to assist the Minister who presides over that Agency in the exercise of the Minister’s powers and performance of the Minister’s duties and functions relating to production, procurement and investment in respect of national defence or national security. That Act also provides for certain other powers, duties and functions of that Minister. Subdivision A also makes related and consequential amendments to other Acts.
Subdivision B of Division 16 amends the Defence Production Act to, among other things,
(a) extend the application of that Act to supplies and projects related to national security and to services related to national defence and national security;
(b) provide that the Minister who presides over the Defence Investment Agency has exclusive authority to acquire supplies and services related to national defence and national security that are required for the purposes of a department, board or agency of the Government of Canada, subject to certain exceptions;
(c) extend the purposes for which that Minister may engage in stockpiling to include national defence and national security, including economic security, and the defence and security of an associated government or other state;
(d) provide that Minister with new financial authorities, including the authority to enter into financial transactions for the purpose of investment in national defence and national security sectors; and
(e) establish procurement rules in relation to national defence and national security.
Subdivision B also makes consequential amendments and terminology changes to certain legislative texts.
Division 17 of Part 4 amends the Canada Transportation Act to, among other things,
(a) authorize the Governor in Council to choose to have the backlog of air travel complaints resolved by third parties engaged by the Minister of Transport or the Canadian Transportation Agency;
(b) transfer responsibility for the resolution of air travel complaints from the Canadian Transportation Agency to the Minister of Transport;
(c) authorize the Governor in Council to choose to have future air travel complaints resolved by third parties approved by the Minister of Transport;
(d) transfer authority to make regulations respecting air passenger rights from the Canadian Transportation Agency to the Minister of Transport;
(e) remove mandatory confidentiality requirements regarding air travel complaints; and
(f) increase the maximum administrative penalty payable by corporations for certain violations of the Canada Transportation Act or its regulations.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-31s:

C-31 (2022) Law Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 2 (Targeted Support for Households)
C-31 (2021) Reducing Barriers to Reintegration Act
C-31 (2016) Law Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
C-31 (2014) Law Economic Action Plan 2014 Act, No. 1

Votes

June 3, 2026 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-31, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on November 4, 2025 (all remaining provisions of the bill)
June 3, 2026 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-31, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on November 4, 2025 (Part 4, Division 17, that is clauses 339 to 364 of the bill)
June 3, 2026 Failed 2nd reading of Bill C-31, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on November 4, 2025 (reasoned amendment)
June 1, 2026 Passed Time allocation for Bill C-31, A second Act to implement certain provisions of the budget tabled in Parliament on November 4, 2025

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-31 is a complex budget implementation act that establishes a new Defence Investment Agency to streamline military procurement, amends the Pest Control Products Act, and implements various fiscal measures. Opposition parties have criticized the bill as an omnibus measure that lacks transparency and accountability.

Liberal

  • Strengthening the national economy: The party prioritizes a one Canadian economy approach by removing interprovincial barriers, diversifying global trade markets, and establishing a sovereign wealth fund to drive major infrastructure investments across all regions of Canada.
  • Modernizing defence procurement: Bill C-31 proposes a stand-alone Defence Investment Agency to streamline equipment delivery for the Armed Forces, meet NATO spending benchmarks, and leverage procurement to support Canadian manufacturing and technological innovation.
  • Protecting Northern sovereignty: Amendments to the Territorial Lands Act give the government tools to safeguard mineral rights in the national interest, ensuring responsible resource development and deeper economic partnerships with Inuit and Northern communities.
  • Addressing affordability and housing: The legislation includes measures to lower the cost of living and accelerate housing construction, particularly near transit hubs, while maintaining robust social programs for seniors, women, and vulnerable populations.

Conservative

  • Address the economic recession: Conservatives argue the bill fails to address the current recession or reduce wasteful government spending, which fuels inflation and contributes to record-high food bank usage across Canada.
  • Reform defence procurement oversight: Members oppose Division 16, asserting it creates a bureaucratic Defence Investment Agency with broad, unaccountable spending powers and potential for patronage instead of addressing the military's actual operational needs.
  • Provide tax and housing relief: The party calls for eliminating federal fuel taxes and removing the GST from new home construction to combat the cost-of-living crisis and encourage housing development.
  • Oppose omnibus legislative tactics: Conservatives criticize the bill’s omnibus nature, arguing that substantive changes to defence procurement and transportation require separate legislation to ensure proper parliamentary scrutiny and accountability.

NDP

  • Tax corporate excess profits: The NDP criticizes the government for prioritizing corporate subsidies over families and calls for an excess profit tax on grocery and oil companies to fund public services and help Canadians manage rising costs.
  • Enforce the Canada Health Act: The party demands federal enforcement of the Canada Health Act against healthcare privatization and calls for full commitment to universal pharmacare, integrated mental health care, and expanded dental care for all Canadians.
  • Oppose international development cuts: Heather McPherson rejects the $2.7-billion cut to international development assistance, asserting that Canada is retreating from its responsibility to lead in peacekeeping and diplomacy during a period of global economic instability.
  • Address structural affordability issues: The party argues that temporary rebates fail to solve underlying economic insecurity, advocating for a focus on structural changes including large-scale housing projects and investments directly in people rather than shareholders.

Bloc

  • Lack of transparency and consultation: The Bloc opposes the bill and the government's use of closure motions, arguing that the Liberals have abandoned meaningful consultation with opposition parties and are rushing the massive bill through without proper technical briefings.
  • Fails to address Quebec's priorities: Members critize the legislation for failing to address the tariff crisis affecting Quebec's SMEs, the forestry industry's needs, and the provincial government's requests for funding regarding asylum seekers and stolen election funds.
  • Opposes oil industry subsidies: The party rejects the bill's expansion of subsidies to the oil and gas industry and criticized the classification of methane-derived hydrogen as clean, arguing these measures contradict environmental priorities and waste billions in potential revenue.
  • Concerns about passenger protection: The Bloc expresses concern that the bill reduces government accountability by allowing private firms to handle air traveller complaints, potentially leaving passengers at the mercy of companies selected by the airlines themselves.

Green

  • Restricted parliamentary debate: The Green Party opposes the frequent use of time allocation and gag orders on massive omnibus bills, arguing it prevents the necessary scrutiny and debate required for substantial legislation.
  • Weakening pesticide oversight: Elizabeth May criticizes changes to the Pest Control Products Act that replace mandatory 15-year cyclical re-evaluations with discretionary assessments, arguing this shift undermines science-based protections for human health and the environment.
  • Prioritizing economics over health: The party expresses concern that new provisions allow cabinet to override scientific health and safety decisions regarding dangerous pesticides based on economic interests, potentially compromising national safety for commercial gains.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly Block Conservative Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, SK

Madam Speaker, today we are debating the 330-page budget implementation act, no. 2. All I can say is here we go again. This act, which puts in place measures to implement what was announced in the update, is just more of what we have become accustomed to from the Liberal government. The Liberals keep building bureaucracies and spending at speeds never seen before, faster than the previous Trudeau government. Any fiscal room that was generated by higher-than-expected revenues went immediately out the door.

For more than a decade, the Liberals have preached that deficit spending will drive the growth in the economy needed to produce good-paying jobs for Canadians. For a government that is desperately trying to convince Canadians it is different and would achieve the results Canadians have been waiting a decade for, the spring economic update proves very little has changed. Every dollar that comes into the economy is another dollar to subsidize itself.

The Liberals have caused the regulatory burden in Canada to balloon and suppress innovation and growth. Inaction is a choice. A perfect example of this is the sections in this bill that create the Defence Investment Agency as a stand-alone entity. The powers it is granting to an unnamed minister are broad and sweeping. The exceptions to competitive procurements are vast and can be used as much as the unknown minister chooses. Exceptions are likely to become the norm.

No one would argue that defence procurement has been in major need of reform. Onerous rules and layers of bureaucratic processes have only grown. The pace that meets the operational needs of the Canadian Armed Forces has been sorely needed. One could expect that over the 11 years the Liberals have been in power, they would have worked to overhaul and reform the systems and rules around procurement. One could expect it, but they would be wrong. The Liberals' solution to the bureaucratic bloat seems to be the exact same as it was a year ago. It was in Bill C-5 this time last year that the Liberals claimed they needed extraordinary powers to bypass regulations and roadblocks that got in the way of major projects. They have yet to use any of those powers to designate a project in the national interest to advance our resource development.

I do not bring up Bill C-5 to talk about the lack of results from the government on resource development; there are more than enough examples to talk about this elsewhere. I bring it up because it was originally drafted in such a way that would have allowed the government to bypass not only certain acts of Parliament to build projects, but virtually any act of Parliament. Allow me to list a few of the acts it sought the ability to bypass before it was amended at committee: the Access to Information Act, the Canada Labour Code, the Conflict of Interest Act, the Foreign Influence Transparency and Accountability Act, the Investment Canada Act and the Lobbying Act just to name a few.

The only reason this was prevented at the time was because of the minority government that Canadians had elected. A year later, now we have the same story. Procurement has become slow, costly and unable to deliver the lethality and operational readiness our armed forces need. To give members an idea of the state of operational readiness in our armed forces, we can use the Department of National Defence's own annual results from 2024-25. Less than 60% of our maritime fleet is serviceable and ready to go out on operations. Only 51% of our land fleets are sitting at the ready and well maintained so troops can use them. Only 42% of our aircraft in the Canadian Armed Forces are ready to serve and have the proper maintenance. That is years of waiting for the government to deliver while rules and processes grew without any reform.

The solution, according to the Liberals, is not to bring about reform or transformation, but rather to grant an unknown minister near-unlimited power to bypass competitive procurement rules. He or she would be able to bar anyone from being allowed to compete without ever having to provide a reason why.

This unknown minister can draw $1 billion from the consolidated revenue fund, without ever needing to go to the Treasury Board to purchase shares in companies, and fire entire boards. They can use exceptions to competitive procurements to no end, never having to justify or report it to anyone. These powers can be delegated to the CEO, undermining the entire point having a single place for accountability.

A year ago, we had Bill C-5, and the same story, the same solution was presented. In this case, however, the Liberals are seeking the ability to just go around the rules without ever having to explain why to anyone. This is rife for abuse. If power is to be given, the case must be made for how it will be balanced with accountability. This budget implementation act allows the same failed thinking that got us here: no case for reform and no change in approach.

As I said, inaction is a choice. Proud Canadians in my riding of Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek were looking for a signal that something better was on the way. Instead, they see that the Liberals under this Prime Minister have not changed their approach at all. Deficit spending still has not produced the results the Liberals have been promising.

The interest on our debt will total more than $50 billion. Nobody on that side of the aisle seems to be interested in what we could do with our economy with that $50 billion every year. These interest charges will continue to rise and total more than a projected $80 billion by 2030‑31, with no course correction in sight.

Instead, the Liberals continue to announce even new ways to deficit spend: enter the sovereign debt fund. We recently learned that the estimated interest payments to borrow the money for this fund will be three-quarters of a billion dollars annually. They have yet to even tell Canadians what the return on their money might be. Canadians have been waiting. They continue to pay their taxes and play by the rules. They have kept their end of the deal. Saskatchewan and Saskatchewanians have kept their end of the deal. In return, the government is supposed to deliver on the results it promised Canadians. It is avoiding real change.

Instead, after more than a year since the previous election, it has opted to tinker with the margins or make small changes around the edges, and it has not been willing to change the approach it has taken to our economy. Its spending and its Defence Investment Agency all follow the same failed logic of the previous 10 years. Simply allowing the Liberals to have more power and more authority to avoid the bureaucracy they created and accountability is not the solution.

Conservatives will wait to see who will be named as minister, and whether the Liberals will use their manufactured majority to continue a pattern of avoiding accountability at committee when this bill is referred to it.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:10 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, just over the last year, after Canadians elected a new prime minister and a new government, our Prime Minister and our government have made it very clear how we want to build a stronger and healthier country. The member made a lot of references to Saskatchewan, understandably so. Coast to coast to coast, we have a government that is committed to building the infrastructure and getting the investments. When I think of the provinces out in the prairies, I think of the LNG and the pipelines. In Saskatchewan, we can talk about the copper, the mines, the potash, the canola, and so forth. We have a government that is really focused on building up western Canada.

I am wondering if she could provide her thoughts in regard to just how important it is that we continue to support the major building projects that are under way.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly Block Conservative Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, SK

Madam Speaker, I believe that under way are the key words in that phrase, because the first five projects the government announced were well under way. That was more performative than anything. What I would say is that Bill C-31 is proof that in year 11, the Liberals continue to put forward legislation that keeps the same failed logic we have come to expect. Believing that an 11th try using deficits to fund jobs will bear the fruit they desire is wishful thinking. I heard someone else say the issues are real and the consequences of bad policy-making are being felt across the country by Canadians. It truly is time the government holds up its end of the deal and changes course from the reckless deficit spending it has become known for.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:10 p.m.

Bloc

Martin Champoux Bloc Drummond, QC

Madam Speaker, I congratulate my colleague on her speech.

I know that her province of Saskatchewan obviously has very significant trade ties with our neighbour to the south, the United States. I also know that Saskatchewan was quite pleased to see that an agreement had been reached with China on canola.

The fact remains that, historically speaking, our number one economic partner has been the United States. Right now, this government is doing nothing to solve the problem, or should I say problems, that we are experiencing because of President Trump's extremely hostile economic policies.

I would like my colleague to comment on that. This government behaves as though it were the saviour of the Canadian economy in the face of Donald Trump, but there is nothing in its track record over the past year to suggest that we are on the right track.

I would like to know whether this is as much of a concern in Saskatchewan as it is for us.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly Block Conservative Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, SK

Madam Speaker, that could be a very short answer if I wanted it to be. The answer is absolutely I am worried. I am worried about the fact that we have a government in power that has created the mess in our economy and then wants all Canadians to believe it has come up with the solutions and is the saviour to the problems it has created.

Yes, I am worried because the government continues to introduce the same failed policies that got us to this place after 11 years. I do not see it changing, and that is deeply concerning.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Jansen Conservative Cloverdale—Langley City, BC

Madam Speaker, every dollar spent on interest is a dollar that cannot be spent on the future. Canadians will pay more than $50 billion this year simply to pay the interest charges on federal debt. That money produces nothing. It creates no jobs, builds no infrastructure and improves no public services.

Could my colleague share her thoughts on the long-term consequences of forcing Canadian families and future generations to carry the cost of today's reckless deficits?

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly Block Conservative Carlton Trail—Eagle Creek, SK

Madam Speaker, we are already seeing what the devastating effects are for Canadians today. Without a change in policy, without a change in the government continuing to implement its deficit spending and believe that somehow things are going to get better for Canadians, that is concerning. It is just going to continue to repeat itself long into the future if the Liberals do not get control of the deficit and their deficit spending.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Grant Jackson Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Madam Speaker, it is certainly my pleasure to get up today and put a few words on the record about the disastrous situation in which we find ourselves with the government moving time allocation on Bill C-31.

Some of my colleagues today have covered the challenges pretty well. This is a habit we see from the Liberal government relatively frequently. We have members opposite making comments that this is a new Liberal government. Of course, it is not. The vast majority of members of the government benches on that side are certainly people who have been in cabinet and parliamentary secretary roles for a very long time, so the argument that this is a new government in any way, shape or form is a bit fictitious. Nonetheless, the government continues to perpetuate this myth to the Canadian public, which we find very unfortunate.

Similarly unfortunate is the Liberals' inability to control their own spending. The Liberals go on and on about how they are going to create more jobs and how everybody in Canada is going to do better with just one more deficit. One more is going to do it. “I promise,” say the Liberals, that one more deficit will be the one that is going to get Canadians ahead this time and we are going to make it. We have yet to see that reap any real benefits for Canadians after 11 long, tired years of this failed economic strategy.

In fact, more Canadians now are lined up at food banks than at any point in recorded history. That is a shockingly bad statistic and one that these members fail to take accountability for. It is a bit alarming that they seem to think that the few programs they have put forward, some of which are tweaked with this budget implementation act, are going to make any substantial dent in those enormously long lines at every single food bank across the country, many of which are actually running out of food.

We are a bit shocked that the Liberals cannot eat a little slice of humble pie. They cannot find that at a food bank because they are out of food, but if they could make one for themselves and take a little bite, it might be good for the Canadian public to see that for the first time from the tired 11-year-old Liberal government. They might actually come to appreciate the efforts they are undertaking maybe slightly more, because right now they seem to hear from the government that life has never been better. I do not know any constituents in Brandon—Souris who believe that is true.

On top of that, then the Liberals go and blow another $60-billion deficit, or whatever they managed to pitch that down to with the spring economic update. It is shockingly high for a government that committed in the last election to spend less to invest more. What happened to that? I have no idea where that slogan went to die, somewhere in the Liberal backbench. Perhaps the member for Laurier—Sainte-Marie took that with him when he walked out with the environmental caucus. I am not sure where that is going, but nonetheless, we are concerned about the spending the government continues to perpetuate.

If that was not bad enough, now we have government members who do not even want to debate their spending or answer questions regarding their spending. The Prime Minister failed to stand up and answer any questions in question period today. It is fair game to question why exactly that is. He also failed to take any questions from the media all weekend long, including today, and particularly on Friday, when it was announced that this country has in fact dived into what is unquestionably meeting the definition of a recession.

The parliamentary secretary to the finance minister often stands up and loudly proclaims the Prime Minister's economic credentials. If he is such an expert, why does he not want to answer questions about the economy? He does not want to answer them from us. If he does not respect Parliament and does not want to answer questions in question period more than once a week because it is too much of a bother for him, okay, but he should answer questions from the media then. The Liberals always profess to have a greater respect for the national press gallery than Conservatives, they claim, and yet it is our leader time and time again taking questions from the media.

I was with him today when he offered a press conference, offering not just critiques of the government, but also our party's proposed path forward to deliver a better economic path for this country that might get us back out of this recession. There was nothing from the Prime Minister, nothing at all. What a shame. There was nothing from the finance minister either. Where is the finance minister? Why is he not answering these questions for the media, if not for the House of Commons?

I would add that I am splitting my time with the esteemed member for Airdrie—Cochrane.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:20 p.m.

An hon. member

Oh, oh!

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:20 p.m.

Conservative

Grant Jackson Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Madam Speaker, the member for Winnipeg North knows better than that. I know that he does not like what I have to say, because he is a member of that tired, exhausted, spent Liberal team that has been in the front couple of benches for the last 11 years. The Liberals have no new ideas. They have no vision on how to spend smarter to actually get this country into a proper economic footprint.

We are the only country in the G7 that has slipped into a recession. That is not a proud legacy for the member for Winnipeg North, and I feel bad for him, except for the fact that he cannot admit it. None of them can over there. They cannot admit their mistake, and that is unfortunate for Winnipeggers, unfortunate for Manitobans and definitely unfortunate for the country of Canada.

Perhaps it is time for some fresh blood from Winnipeg. We have the member for Elmwood Transcona, who is fresh blood as a Winnipegger in the House. What an excellent member of Parliament he is, and I cannot wait to see all the contributions he is going to make to this Parliament over the course of its duration.

However, to get back on track here, we are talking about finances, and it is terribly concerning what that member and the entire Liberal cabinet have done to the finances of this country over the course of the last long 11 years. The Liberals said that budgets balance themselves. Do members remember that one? That was a good one. What happened to the minister of middle-class prosperity? I loved that one, before I got elected to this place. There is still no definition from Liberal members as to what the heck that means. There is no concept. What has happened to the middle class since they appointed that ministry? Well, the ministry got abolished pretty shortly thereafter, because it was such a tire fire. Unfortunately, now all the middle class is at the food banks, and they ran out of food. That pretty much sums up the Liberal record on middle-class prosperity. It has been an abject failure, and now they do not want to even take questions on it.

The Liberals have moved time allocation on this bill so that they have only three hours of debate on a bill that, as my colleagues have mentioned, is over 300 pages long. They are going to ram through votes so that they can go off for the summer and spend like Liberals often do.

I guess we will see. Maybe the eleventh time is the charm. I doubt it. I really doubt it, but perhaps this time the significant deficit put forward by the government, the minister and that failed front bench will have better luck than “budgets balance themselves”, better luck than “spend less to invest more” and better luck, hopefully, I am praying, than the former minister of middle-class prosperity.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:25 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker, I must say that it was interesting listening to the member opposite's statements. At the end of the day, he has not really recognized the true value that is before the House today.

What we are talking about is a budget implementation bill that is a reflection of what I believe Canadians want to see. For example, we can talk about the groceries and essentials rebate. We can talk about the excise tax benefit, which is a suspension of 10¢ a litre until September. There are all sorts of wonderful things. There are small items, but also big items. There are big items that Manitoba is benefiting from for the first time in generations.

The member was not even born when the Port of Churchill was first being talked about. For the first time since then, we are talking about the Port of Churchill. I wonder if he supports that particular initiative.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Grant Jackson Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Madam Speaker, I was born in a time when Liberals failed to meet their commitments to Manitoba. There is no question about that.

The member mentioned the Port of Churchill. There is no mention of a dollar figure for Churchill. If the Liberals support the Port of Churchill plus project, how much are they spending on it? We do not know, because it is not mentioned in any of these documents. That is the only major project that the Liberal government has come up with for the province of Manitoba.

The Liberals have six Manitoba members. One of them represents northern Manitoba. Is this all they could come up with? There are no budgetary figures for the one project they have got referred to the Major Projects Office. That is a shameful legacy for the Liberal members from Manitoba and a shameful record for the government overall.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:25 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Beaulieu Bloc La Pointe-de-l'Île, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to know what my colleague thinks about the fact that the economic update overlooked President Trump's tariff increase. This is a 25% tariff on all products containing aluminum and steel, and it affects 25% of exports from Quebec to the United States. This makes Quebec the location most affected by tariffs.

The Bloc Québécois is proposing wage subsidy measures. Does my colleague acknowledge that? What solution does he propose?

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Grant Jackson Conservative Brandon—Souris, MB

Madam Speaker, there is no question that Donald Trump's tariffs on Canadian products are an absolute disaster. Unfortunately, an equal disaster is the Liberal government's failure to live up to its election commitment to negotiate a deal with his administration. The Prime Minister touted himself as the big economic expert who was going to fly in and get a win for Canada. Well, here we are, well over a year into his prime ministership, and there is no deal with America, so my friends from Quebec, as well as those from every other province and from specific industries, are facing the brunt of that because of that failed promise from the Liberals.

The Conservatives do not believe in wage subsidies in particular. We would rather negotiate a deal in which we could continue to have tariff-free access to the American market. Our leader has put forward a plan to boost Canadian natural resources, not just in the oil and gas sector but also in the critical minerals sector, and use that as leverage to negotiate with the Americans for tariff-free access to their market.

That is something we would love for the Liberals to pillage from us. Maybe the Minister responsible for Canada-U.S. Trade wants to take that when he is on his next junket down to Washington. We would be glad for him to take it, glad for him to finally get some success on this file and glad to help our friends from Quebec and their industries that have been impacted by Donald Trump's disastrous tariff policy.

Budget 2025 Implementation Act, No. 2Government Orders

June 1st, 2026 / 6:30 p.m.

Conservative

Blake Richards Conservative Airdrie—Cochrane, AB

Madam Speaker, I would like to ask the member something that is absolutely related to this. We hear this talk about the investments that we have yet to see that the Liberals claim they are going to make in our Armed Forces. They claim that it is going to mean huge increases in recruitment for the Canadian Armed Forces, but we see the way they treat our veterans. We see the massive cuts that have been made.

I know that the member represents many veterans in his area. I wonder whether he would like to comment on what he hears from veterans and whether they would recommend that people get involved in our Armed Forces, based on how our veterans are treated by the government.