Thank you very much for the question.
One of things that's a bit odd is that this is a law that was developed a number of years ago in response to a very different circumstance. I would hazard a guess that the drafters weren't contemplating a scenario of its application where a terrorist organization would seize control of a country and assert its authority to govern.
It has created certain challenges. I think you've heard testimony from other witnesses more on the humanitarian aid point of view. There are some things.... My chief obstacle right now is more tied to safe passage. In theory, when you start to think about the different kinds of operations you could have—should you gain access to the country—if there are some taxation issues where the Taliban's trying to collect funds, it could pose challenges.
It's something that we're looking at. It seems to be more of an immediate concern on the humanitarian side of things, but it's not without application in the immigration context, so we're keeping an eye on it and looking to see if there are solutions we can advance before it starts to cause greater challenges. It's something we have to watch closely but, to date, the far bigger challenge I'm facing is the safe passage of Afghans throughout the country and then onward for travel to Canada.