My view is that, when you're dealing with a conflict zone, the need to deal with a robust security screening process increases. Not only do you deal with people who might be potential bad actors and you didn't realize that—the vast majority of people are good and innocent people who would like to come here; I recognize that—but you also are able to confirm that a person is who they say they are.
When it comes to the screening process, it's really important that we follow the advice of our national security agencies. I'll trust my officials to correct me if I'm wrong here, but my understanding is that about 80% of the cases that are rejected for inadmissibility on security grounds come through the biometrics process.
In addition, before you do biometrics, we do an enhanced biographic screening and get whatever information we can on the basis of a person's name, age, where they've been living, if we have access to a social media page—