Thanks, Chair.
I would like you to make a ruling on relevance. The motion on the table has nothing to do with historical facts. It is asking for the submission of documents and reports by different government departments, which have already been mentioned in testimony. The amendment to the motion that is being debated right now mentions removing a date for reporting it back to the House.
I would appreciate it, Chair, if you could just keep any discussion or debate focused on what we're actually discussing, i.e. the motion, not historical information about everything, because the motion has nothing to do with that.
Thanks.