I quite understand the question. My sense is that it's probably a cumulative figure.
Here's what we have that is different, going forward.
One, we have a very focused set of priorities for Kandahar in areas that deal with things such as the delivery of basic services by public institutions to citizens, basic services in education, basic services in infrastructure, basic services in economic growth, and a clear focus on meeting humanitarian needs of refugees, of displaced persons, of the most vulnerable populations with respect to medical services. So we have a very clear set of focused priorities.
Two, we have a number of signature initiatives that are at scale, are visible, are direct, and in the case of the Dahla Dam, for example, will involve a three-year effort, probably somewhere in the range of $50 million. The issue with respect to the building of the 50 schools is another initiative where the investment is at scale, direct, and visible, in the range of $10 million plus.
Polio, and being able to finish the job on polio and work towards the eradication of polio, where the majority of cases in Afghanistan are in the south, is actually a $60 million program that will reach seven million children, 350,000 in Kandahar.
So these signature projects come with an investment program and a sense of scale and a direct effort, alongside our targeted priorities, that we believe actually constitutes the basis for being able to deliver on that target.
That said, this is an ambitious target and it's a target that is not without risk. It is a target that is being conducted in a security environment that is shifting as well. In order to be successful here, we will have to stay very focused on this one. We will have to be able to deliver very particularly and in a flexible way on these objectives and stay the course, including things such as devolving to local authorities and strengthening people on the ground.